Kallmes D F, Hui F K, Mugler J P
Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, East Hospital, Rm 1063, Lee St, Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Radiology. 2001 Oct;221(1):251-5. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2211001712.
The authors compared high-signal-intensity flow-related artifacts present with a conventional two-dimensional (2D) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence with those seen with a single-slab, three-dimensional (3D) FLAIR sequence. Four readers graded the subarachnoid space and intraventricular artifacts, the pulsation artifacts, and the conspicuity of cranial nerves in the posterior fossa. For all comparisons, differences between 2D and 3D images were highly statistically significant, with 3D imaging being superior in all cases.
作者将传统二维(2D)液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)序列中出现的高信号强度血流相关伪影与单层三维(3D)FLAIR序列中所见的伪影进行了比较。四位阅片者对蛛网膜下腔和脑室内伪影、搏动伪影以及后颅窝中颅神经的清晰度进行了分级。对于所有比较,2D和3D图像之间的差异具有高度统计学意义,在所有情况下3D成像均更具优势。