Suppr超能文献

对感觉有电磁超敏反应的人和对照组进行磁场暴露并记录电生理特征的激发试验。

Provocation study of persons with perceived electrical hypersensitivity and controls using magnetic field exposure and recording of electrophysiological characteristics.

作者信息

Lyskov E, Sandström M, Mild K H

机构信息

National Institute for Working Life, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Bioelectromagnetics. 2001 Oct;22(7):457-62.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate possible neurophysiological effects of intermittent 15 sec on/off cycle, 60 Hz, 10 microT magnetic field exposure on patients with perceived "electromagnetic hypersensitivity" (EHS), and control subjects during rest and performance of a mental arithmetic task. Twenty participants (15 female, 5 male, 31-60 years old, mean 45.8 +/- 0.7 years) were invited from the group of EHS patients. Twenty volunteers (15 female, 5 male, 31-59 years old, mean 45.0 +/- 0.7 years?) served as a control group. The test protocol consisted of a set of examinations: EEG, visual evoked potentials, electrodermal activity, ECG, and blood pressure. The total duration of the test was 40 min, divided into two 10 min rest periods and two 10 min periods of mathematical performance. Magnetic field and sham exposures were presented randomly during these periods, resulting in four different conditions: Field-Rest, Sham-Rest, Field-Math, and Sham-Math. The data showed significant main effects of the Group factor (EHS vs. control subjects) on heart rate (F(1,80) = 20.6; P < 0.01), heart rate spectrum ratio (F(1,80) = 9.5; P = 0.02), and electrodermal activity (F(1,76) = 4.2; P = 0.04), whereas EEG characteristics did not differ between groups. The Condition factor (mathematical task vs. relaxed) showed main effects for heart rate (F(1,80) = 14.8; P < 0.01), heart rate spectrum ratio (F(1,80) = 7.8; P = 0.06), electrodermal activity (F(1,76) = 56.8; P < 0.01), and alpha and theta spectral bands of EEG. Magnetic field exposure did not affect autonomous system or electroencephalographic variables of either group. These data do not indicate that EHS patients or control are affected by low-level 60 Hz magnetic field exposure. However, persons reporting EHS differed from the control subjects in baseline values of investigated physiological characteristics. Perhaps EHS patients have a rather distinctive physiological predisposition to sensitivity to physical and psychosocial environmental stressors.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查间歇性15秒开/关周期、60赫兹、10微特斯拉磁场暴露对自认为有“电磁超敏反应”(EHS)的患者以及对照组受试者在休息和进行心算任务期间可能产生的神经生理影响。从EHS患者组中邀请了20名参与者(15名女性,5名男性,年龄31 - 60岁,平均45.8±0.7岁)。20名志愿者(15名女性,5名男性,年龄31 - 59岁,平均45.0±0.7岁?)作为对照组。测试方案包括一系列检查:脑电图(EEG)、视觉诱发电位、皮肤电活动、心电图(ECG)和血压。测试总时长为40分钟,分为两个10分钟的休息期和两个10分钟的心算期。在这些时间段内随机进行磁场暴露和假暴露,产生四种不同情况:磁场 - 休息、假暴露 - 休息、磁场 - 心算和假暴露 - 心算。数据显示,组因素(EHS患者与对照组受试者)对心率(F(1,80) = 20.6;P < 0.01)、心率谱比(F(1,80) = 9.5;P = 0.02)和皮肤电活动(F(1,76) = 4.2;P = 0.04)有显著的主效应,而脑电图特征在两组之间没有差异。条件因素(心算任务与放松状态)对心率(F(1,80) = 14.8;P < 0.01)、心率谱比(F(1,80) = 7.8;P = 0.06)、皮肤电活动(F(1,76) = 56.8;P < 0.01)以及脑电图的α和θ频段有主效应。磁场暴露对两组的自主神经系统或脑电图变量均无影响。这些数据并未表明EHS患者或对照组受到低水平60赫兹磁场暴露的影响。然而,报告有EHS的人与对照组受试者在所研究的生理特征基线值方面存在差异。也许EHS患者对身体和心理社会环境应激源的敏感性具有相当独特的生理易感性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验