Mayrovitz H N, Groseclose E E, Markov M, Pilla A A
College of Medical Sciences, Department of Physiology, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33328, USA.
Bioelectromagnetics. 2001 Oct;22(7):494-502. doi: 10.1002/bem.78.abs.
Effects on skin blood perfusion of permanent ceramic magnets [0.1 T (1000 G) surface field], individually (disk shaped, 4 cm diameter x 1 cm thick) or in the form of a 11 x 7 in pad ( approximately 28 x 17.8 cm) with an array of 16 rectangular magnets (4.5 x 2.2 cm), were investigated in 16 female volunteers (27.4 +/- 1.7 years, range 21-48 years) using three separate protocols. In protocol A, a disk magnet was placed on the palmar surface of the hand in contact with the thenar eminence (n = 5). In protocol B, the magnet was placed on the hand dorsum overlying the thenar eminence (n = 5). In protocol C, the entire palm and fingers rested on the magnetic pad (n = 6). Magnets were in place for 36 min on one hand, and a sham was in place on the other hand. Blood perfusion was measured on the middle finger dorsum by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and on the index finger by laser Doppler imaging (LDI). Perfusion measurements were simultaneously taken in sham and magnet exposed hands, before and during the entire magnet exposure interval. Magnetic field effects were tested by comparing skin blood perfusion sequences in magnet and sham exposed regions. Results showed no significant changes in either LDF or LDI perfusion at magnet or sham sites during exposure, nor were there any significant differences between sham and magnet sites for any protocol. Measurements of skin temperature at the LDF measurement sites also showed no significant change. It is concluded that in the healthy subjects studied with normal, unstressed circulation, magnets of the type and for the duration used, showed no detectible effect on skin blood perfusion in the anatomical area studied.
研究了永久陶瓷磁体[表面场强0.1 T(1000 G)]对皮肤血液灌注的影响,磁体分别为圆盘形(直径4 cm×厚1 cm)或呈11×7英寸垫子(约28×17.8 cm)形式,带有16个矩形磁体(4.5×2.2 cm)阵列。在16名女性志愿者(年龄27.4±1.7岁,范围21 - 48岁)中采用三种不同方案进行了研究。在方案A中,将一个圆盘磁体放置在手掌表面与鱼际隆起接触处(n = 5)。在方案B中,将磁体放置在手背鱼际隆起上方(n = 5)。在方案C中,整个手掌和手指放在磁性垫子上(n = 6)。磁体在一只手上放置36分钟,另一只手上放置假磁体。通过激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)测量中指背侧的血液灌注,通过激光多普勒成像(LDI)测量食指的血液灌注。在整个磁体暴露间隔之前和期间,同时在假磁体和暴露于磁体的手上进行灌注测量。通过比较磁体和假磁体暴露区域的皮肤血液灌注序列来测试磁场效应。结果显示,在暴露期间,磁体或假磁体部位的LDF或LDI灌注均无显著变化,任何方案中假磁体和磁体部位之间也无显著差异。LDF测量部位的皮肤温度测量也未显示出显著变化。得出的结论是,在所研究的健康受试者中(循环正常且无压力),所用类型和持续时间的磁体对所研究解剖区域的皮肤血液灌注未显示出可检测到的影响。