• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度或重度闭合性颅脑损伤儿童的字面、推理和意图性文本理解比较。

Comparison of literal, inferential, and intentional text comprehension in children with mild or severe closed head injury.

作者信息

Dennis M, Barnes M A

机构信息

Department of Psychology/Brain and Behavior Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001 Oct;16(5):456-68. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200110000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00001199-200110000-00005
PMID:11574041
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with head injury have impairments in pragmatic language at the level of both single words and texts. Text comprehension deficits are likely to be the more consequential for everyday and academic function, yet the relative magnitudes of literal and nonliteral text comprehension deficits have not been measured.

DESIGN

We compared the magnitude of the impairment in three forms of text comprehension for children with mild or severe head injury relative with controls: literal language (understanding literal text information), inferential language (making pragmatic inferences, textual coherence inferences, or enriching inferences), and the language of mental states and intentions (eg, producing speech acts, appreciating irony, and understanding deception).

MEASURES

Effect sizes were used to measure the magnitude of the difference between children with head injury and age-matched controls.

RESULTS

Children with severe closed-head injury were significantly impaired on tasks of literal text understanding, inferencing, and intentionality. Children with mild head injury were impaired on some inferencing and all intentionality tasks, although they had no literal text comprehension deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

For both groups, the greatest deficits (ie, the largest effect sizes) were on tasks requiring understanding of the language of mental states and intentions. The data bear on the long-term effects of childhood closed-head injury on text- and discourse-level language and also on the nature and timing of language rehabilitation in children with head injury.

摘要

背景

头部受伤儿童在单词和文本层面的语用语言方面存在缺陷。文本理解缺陷可能对日常和学业功能产生更严重的影响,但字面和非字面文本理解缺陷的相对程度尚未得到衡量。

设计

我们比较了轻度或重度头部受伤儿童与对照组在三种文本理解形式上的损伤程度:字面语言(理解字面文本信息)、推理语言(进行语用推理、文本连贯推理或丰富推理)以及心理状态和意图语言(例如,产生言语行为、理解反讽和理解欺骗)。

测量方法

效应量用于衡量头部受伤儿童与年龄匹配对照组之间差异的程度。

结果

重度闭合性头部受伤儿童在字面文本理解、推理和意图性任务上存在显著损伤。轻度头部受伤儿童在一些推理和所有意图性任务上存在损伤,尽管他们没有字面文本理解缺陷。

结论

对于两组儿童,最大的缺陷(即最大的效应量)出现在需要理解心理状态和意图语言的任务上。这些数据涉及儿童闭合性头部受伤对文本和语篇层面语言的长期影响,以及头部受伤儿童语言康复的性质和时机。

相似文献

1
Comparison of literal, inferential, and intentional text comprehension in children with mild or severe closed head injury.轻度或重度闭合性颅脑损伤儿童的字面、推理和意图性文本理解比较。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001 Oct;16(5):456-68. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200110000-00005.
2
Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise following childhood head injury.儿童头部受伤后对字面意义上的真相、讽刺性批评和虚假赞扬的理解。
Brain Lang. 2001 Jul;78(1):1-16. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2431.
3
Non-literal language deficits in mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍中的非字面语言缺陷。
Psychogeriatrics. 2014 Dec;14(4):222-8. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12101.
4
Thinking aloud: effects on text comprehension by children with specific language impairment and their peers.出声思考:对特定语言障碍儿童及其同伴的文本理解的影响
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Nov;49(6):637-48. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12081. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
5
Fostering literal and inferential language skills in Head Start preschoolers with language impairment using scripted book-sharing discussions.通过脚本化的图书分享讨论,培养有语言障碍的“启智计划”学龄前儿童的字面和推理语言技能。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006 Feb;15(1):85-95. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/009).
6
Understanding text after severe closed-head injury: assessing inferences and memory operations with a think-aloud procedure.重度闭合性颅脑损伤后的文本理解:通过出声思考程序评估推理和记忆操作。
Brain Lang. 2005 Sep;94(3):331-46. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.007.
7
Making Inferences From Text: It's Vocabulary That Matters.从文本中进行推理:关键在于词汇。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Aug 1;58(4):1224-32. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0330.
8
High-level linguistic disturbances subsequent to childhood closed head injury.儿童闭合性颅脑损伤后的高级语言障碍。
Brain Inj. 1996 Oct;10(10):729-38. doi: 10.1080/026990596123990.
9
Language performance of severely closed head injured children.重度闭合性颅脑损伤儿童的语言表现。
Brain Inj. 1996 Feb;10(2):91-7. doi: 10.1080/026990596124575.
10
Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: a comparison of specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and high-functioning autism.有沟通障碍儿童的推理加工与故事回忆:特定语言障碍、语用语言障碍和高功能自闭症的比较
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2002 Jul-Sep;37(3):227-51. doi: 10.1080/13682820210136269.

引用本文的文献

1
Theory of mind in utterance interpretation: the case from clinical pragmatics.话语理解中的心理理论:来自临床语用学的案例
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 26;6:1286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01286. eCollection 2015.
2
Cognitive, affective, and conative theory of mind (ToM) in children with traumatic brain injury.儿童创伤性脑损伤的认知、情感和意志心理理论(ToM)。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jul;5:25-39. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.006. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
3
Theory of mind in children with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤儿童的心理理论。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Sep;18(5):908-16. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712000756. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
4
Language disorders in children with central nervous system injury.中枢神经系统损伤儿童的语言障碍。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Apr;32(4):417-32. doi: 10.1080/13803390903164355.
5
Traumatic brain injury in young children: postacute effects on cognitive and school readiness skills.幼儿创伤性脑损伤:对认知和入学准备技能的急性后期影响。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008 Sep;14(5):734-45. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708081150.