Suppr超能文献

韩裔美国人、菲律宾裔美国人和高加索裔美国人中的种族、应对方式与痛苦

Ethnicity, coping, and distress among Korean Americans, Filipino Americans, and Caucasian Americans.

作者信息

Bjorck J P, Cuthbertson W, Thurman J W, Lee Y S

机构信息

Graduate School of Psychology, Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;141(4):421-42. doi: 10.1080/00224540109600563.

Abstract

The authors examined appraisal, coping, and distress among Korean American, Filipino American, and Caucasian American Protestants. No interaction effects emerged among ethnic groups, but there were significant ethnic main effects for appraisal and coping. Compared with the Caucasian Americans, both Asian American groups appraised stressors as more challenging, and the Korean Americans appraised them also as greater losses. Both Asian American groups reported using more strategies of accepting responsibility, religious coping, distancing, and escape-avoidance than the Caucasian Americans did; the Filipino Americans also reported more problem-solving strategies than the Caucasian Americans. For all participants, challenge appraisals predicted adaptive coping (problem solving and positive reappraisal) and less distress. Problem solving, seeking social support, and positive reappraisal predicted less distress; self-control, accepting responsibility, and escape-avoidance predicted greater distress. The authors stressed the value of assessing ethnicity in coping research.

摘要

作者研究了韩裔美国人、菲律宾裔美国人和欧裔美国新教徒的评价、应对方式和痛苦程度。种族群体之间未出现交互效应,但在评价和应对方式上存在显著的种族主效应。与欧裔美国人相比,两个亚裔美国人群体都将压力源评估为更具挑战性,韩裔美国人还将其评估为更大的损失。两个亚裔美国人群体都报告称,他们比欧裔美国人更多地使用承担责任、宗教应对、疏离和逃避回避等策略;菲律宾裔美国人还报告称,他们比欧裔美国人更多地使用解决问题的策略。对于所有参与者来说,挑战性评价预测了适应性应对(解决问题和积极重新评价)以及较少的痛苦。解决问题、寻求社会支持和积极重新评价预测了较少的痛苦;自我控制、承担责任和逃避回避预测了更大的痛苦。作者强调了在应对研究中评估种族的价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验