• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Congruence of counselor self-disclosure and perceived effectiveness.

作者信息

Nyman S J, Daugherty T K

机构信息

Department of Educational Studies, Purdue University, USA.

出版信息

J Psychol. 2001 May;135(3):269-76. doi: 10.1080/00223980109603697.

DOI:10.1080/00223980109603697
PMID:11577969
Abstract

Sixty-seven college students rated a counselor on expertness, trustworthiness, and attractiveness based on reading 1 of 2 randomly assigned session transcripts. The desire to choose the depicted counselor was also measured. In both transcripts, the counselor self-disclosed his or her use of prayer. A single-client statement varied across the 2 transcripts such that one contained a congruent counselor self-disclosure (counselor disclosure after client disclosure) and the other included an incongruent self-disclosure (counselor disclosure without client disclosure). A potential covariate, religiosity, was examined but did not draw significant variance. Participants in the congruent group reported a more favorable total perception, a higher attractiveness perception, and a greater desire to choose the counselor than did participants in the incongruent group. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Congruence of counselor self-disclosure and perceived effectiveness.
J Psychol. 2001 May;135(3):269-76. doi: 10.1080/00223980109603697.
2
The interactive effects of counselor gender, physical attractiveness and status on client self-disclosure.咨询师性别、外表吸引力和地位对来访者自我表露的交互作用。
J Clin Psychol. 1982 Jan;38(1):84-90. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<84::aid-jclp2270380111>3.0.co;2-z.
3
The impact of counselor self-disclosure on clients: a meta-analytic review of experimental and quasi-experimental research.咨询师自我表露对来访者的影响:实验和准实验研究的元分析综述。
J Couns Psychol. 2014 Apr;61(2):191-207. doi: 10.1037/a0036189. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
4
Genetic counselor and proxy patient perceptions of genetic counselor responses to prenatal patient self-disclosure requests: Skillfulness is in the eye of the beholder.遗传咨询师和代理患者对遗传咨询师回应产前患者自我披露请求的看法:技能在旁观者的眼中。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Dec;29(6):894-909. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1190. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
5
"What would you do if you were me?" Effects of counselor self-disclosure versus non-disclosure in a hypothetical genetic counseling session.“如果你是我,你会怎么做?”在一次假设的遗传咨询 session 中,咨询师自我表露与不表露的效果。 (注:这里“session”常见释义为“会议、会期、一段时间”等,结合语境可灵活理解为咨询环节等,具体准确意思需根据完整文本判断)
J Genet Couns. 2010 Dec;19(6):570-84. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9310-4. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
6
Gay and bisexual male clients' perceptions of counseling: the role of perceived sexual orientation similarity and counselor universal-diverse orientation.男同性恋和双性恋客户对咨询的看法:感知的性取向相似性和咨询师的普遍多样性取向的作用。
J Couns Psychol. 2011 Jul;58(3):299-309. doi: 10.1037/a0023603.
7
Are perceived professional qualities affected by knowledge of a counselor's sexual orientation?咨询者的性取向认知会影响人们对其专业素质的看法吗?
Psychol Rep. 1998 Dec;83(3 Pt 2):1145-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1998.83.3f.1145.
8
How does disclosing countertransference affect perceptions of the therapist and the session?披露反移情如何影响对治疗师和治疗过程的看法?
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011 Dec;48(4):322-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023134. Epub 2011 May 23.
9
Effects of therapist's self-disclosure and a physical barrier on subjects' perceptions of the therapist: an analogue study.治疗师自我表露及物理屏障对受试者对治疗师认知的影响:一项模拟研究。
Psychol Rep. 1989 Jun;64(3 Pt 1):715-20. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3.715.
10
Relationships among client and counselor agreement about the working alliance, session evaluations, and change in client symptoms using response surface analysis.使用响应面分析探讨来访者和咨询师对工作联盟、会谈评估以及来访者症状变化的一致性之间的关系。
J Couns Psychol. 2012 Jul;59(3):352-67. doi: 10.1037/a0028907.