Boivin M A, Levy H
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131-5271, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct;29(10):1916-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00011.
To determine whether adding erythromycin to a gastric feeding regimen could render it as effective in meeting nutritional needs as transpyloric feeding.
Randomized, controlled study.
University hospital medical, surgical, and neurologic care intensive care units.
Critically ill patients, requiring a projected 96 hrs of enteral feeding, who had no specific indication for tube location (gastric or transpyloric). Eighty patients were randomized.
Patients were randomized to gastric feeding with erythromycin (200 mg iv) given every 8 hrs or feeding through a transpylorically placed feeding tube. Goal rate and feeding advancement were determined by protocol.
During the 96-hr period, the gastric group received 74% of their goal calories and the transpyloric group received 67%. The only day on which gastric feedings were superior was the first study day, where the gastric group attained 55% of their goal, compared with 44% in the transpyloric group. This 1-day difference was the result of an initial failure of tube placement in some subjects. Exclusion of these patients did not change overall results. Nutritional indexes, length of stay in the intensive care unit, ventilator dependence, and survival were not different between the two groups.
Gastric feeding with erythromycin as a prokinetic is equivalent to transpyloric feeding in meeting the nutritional goals of the critically ill.
确定在胃内喂养方案中添加红霉素是否能使其在满足营养需求方面与经幽门喂养同样有效。
随机对照研究。
大学医院的内科、外科和神经科重症监护病房。
预计需要96小时肠内喂养、无特定置管位置(胃内或经幽门)指征的重症患者。80名患者被随机分组。
患者被随机分为每8小时静脉注射200毫克红霉素进行胃内喂养组或通过经幽门放置的喂养管进行喂养组。目标喂养速率和喂养推进由方案确定。
在96小时期间,胃内喂养组摄入了其目标热量的74%,经幽门喂养组摄入了67%。胃内喂养优于经幽门喂养的唯一一天是研究的第一天,胃内喂养组达到了其目标的55%,而经幽门喂养组为44%。这一天的差异是由于一些受试者最初置管失败导致的。排除这些患者并未改变总体结果。两组之间的营养指标、重症监护病房住院时间、呼吸机依赖情况和生存率并无差异。
使用红霉素作为促动力剂进行胃内喂养在满足重症患者营养目标方面等同于经幽门喂养。