Suppr超能文献

精神科诊断与实践中的文化和历史

Culture and history in psychiatric diagnosis and practice.

作者信息

Fàbrega H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2001 Sep;24(3):391-405. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70236-7.

Abstract

A brief review of the history of Western psychiatry underscores how happenings in Anglo European societies during the early modern and modern era impacted on regional populations in the midst of profound demographic, social and political economic change. Such factors along with cultural conventions created an amalgam of behavior problems: social responses to these under the aegis administrative bodies gave rise to the discipline and profession of psychiatry. Central tenets that we take for granted as facts about psychiatric disorders (e.g., their manifestations, natural history, diagnosis) were shaped by historical and cultural influences. Psychiatry may outline a science of the psyche and its disturbances but it also reflects a cultural interpretation about personal experience, responsibility, social behavior, and the requirements for social order. The cultural character of the psychiatric enterprise itself, just as much as the characteristics of its disorders, constitute the subject matter of cultural psychiatry. Events during the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries in Anglo European societies gave rise to psychiatry. First, there took place the differentiation of psychiatric disorders from the pool of human social and behavior problems. Second, and in relation to this, a segment of the medical profession was accorded (or appropriated) a social mandate and acquired an obligation to treat victims of mental disorders. The historical sociology of psychiatry constitutes one aspect of cultural psychiatry. The second covers developments during the latter part of the twentieth century. At this juncture, psychiatry became the target of labeling theorists in sociology, cultural relativists in anthropology, antipsychiatrists from within the discipline itself, and revisionist and critical historians of psychiatry. An outgrowth of this is the perspective that underscores the important role played by values, ideas, and world-views in how individuals experience and carry out their lives, phenomena that are critical to the expression, interpretation, diagnosis, and treatment of psychiatric disorders. That the science and practice of modern psychiatry incorporate an ethnocentric, Anglo European bias or slant on psychopathology is an integral assumption of cultural psychiatry. By describing how other non-Western systems of psychiatry have operated, for example, their theories and practices, one gains a further appreciation of the important role of culture in shaping Western psychiatry. This is taken up in an article by Fàbrega elsewhere in this issue where concepts and practices of traditional Chinese and Indian medicine that pertain to mental health and illness are reviewed.

摘要

对西方精神病学历史的简要回顾凸显了近代早期和现代英欧社会所发生的事件,在深刻的人口、社会和政治经济变革背景下,是如何对当地人口产生影响的。这些因素与文化习俗共同构成了一系列行为问题的混合体:在行政机构的支持下,社会对这些问题的反应催生了精神病学这一学科和职业。我们视为关于精神疾病事实的核心信条(例如,其表现、自然病程、诊断)是由历史和文化影响塑造而成的。精神病学或许勾勒出了一门关于心理及其紊乱的科学,但它也反映了一种关于个人经历、责任、社会行为以及社会秩序要求的文化解读。精神病学事业本身的文化特征,与其疾病的特征一样,构成了文化精神病学的主题。18世纪末和19世纪英欧社会发生的事件催生了精神病学。首先,精神疾病从人类社会和行为问题的范畴中分化出来。其次,与此相关的是,一部分医学专业人员被赋予(或自行承担起)一项社会使命,并承担起治疗精神障碍患者的责任。精神病学的历史社会学构成了文化精神病学的一个方面。第二个方面涵盖20世纪后半叶的发展情况。在这个阶段,精神病学成为社会学中的标签理论家、人类学中的文化相对主义者、该学科内部的反精神病学家以及精神病学的修正主义和批判历史学家的攻击目标。由此产生的一个观点强调了价值观、观念和世界观在个体如何体验和度过其生活中所起的重要作用,这些现象对于精神疾病的表现、解读、诊断和治疗至关重要。现代精神病学的科学与实践在精神病理学方面包含一种以欧洲为中心的、英欧偏见或倾向,这是文化精神病学的一个固有假设。通过描述其他非西方精神病学体系的运作方式,例如它们的理论和实践,人们能进一步认识到文化在塑造西方精神病学过程中的重要作用。本期其他地方法布雷加的一篇文章探讨了这一问题,其中回顾了与心理健康和疾病相关的传统中医和印度医学的概念与实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验