Suppr超能文献

识别记忆和语言流畅性可将可能的阿尔茨海默病与皮质下缺血性血管性痴呆区分开来。

Recognition memory and verbal fluency differentiate probable Alzheimer disease from subcortical ischemic vascular dementia.

作者信息

Tierney M C, Black S E, Szalai J P, Snow W G, Fisher R H, Nadon G, Chui H C

机构信息

Geriatric Research, A145, Sunnybrook and Women's Health Sciences Center, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.

出版信息

Arch Neurol. 2001 Oct;58(10):1654-9. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.10.1654.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer disease (AD) and vascular dementia are among the most frequently occurring causes of dementia in the world, and their accurate differentiation is important because different pharmaceutical strategies may modify the course of each disease.

OBJECTIVE

To determine which of 10 neuropsychological test scores can accurately differentiate patients with probable AD from those with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD) for use in evidence-based clinical practice.

DESIGN

Patients with suspected dementia were referred to the study by family physicians, geriatricians, and neurologists. All participants received a thorough assessment according to standard diagnostic guidelines. Diagnoses of probable AD (n = 31) and probable SIVD (n = 31) were made according to consensus criteria. The diagnosticians were blind to the results of the 10 neuropsychological test scores.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups in age or Mini-Mental State Examination scores. Logistic regression analyses identified 2 neuropsychological tests that best distinguished the groups (sensitivity = 81%; specificity = 84%; positive likelihood ratio = 5.1). These were the recognition memory subtest of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test. The AD group performed better on the oral association test, whereas the SIVD group did better on the recognition memory test.

CONCLUSION

Patients with probable AD and probable SIVD can be distinguished with a high degree of accuracy using these 2 neuropsychological tests.

摘要

背景

阿尔茨海默病(AD)和血管性痴呆是世界上最常见的痴呆病因,准确区分它们很重要,因为不同的药物治疗策略可能会改变每种疾病的病程。

目的

确定10项神经心理学测试分数中的哪一项能够准确区分可能患有AD的患者与皮质下缺血性血管性痴呆(SIVD)患者,以用于循证临床实践。

设计

疑似痴呆患者由家庭医生、老年病科医生和神经科医生转诊至本研究。所有参与者均根据标准诊断指南接受了全面评估。根据共识标准诊断出可能患有AD的患者(n = 31)和可能患有SIVD的患者(n = 31)。诊断人员对10项神经心理学测试分数的结果不知情。

结果

两组在年龄或简易精神状态检查表分数方面无显著差异。逻辑回归分析确定了2项最能区分两组的神经心理学测试(敏感性 = 81%;特异性 = 84%;阳性似然比 = 5.1)。这两项测试分别是雷伊听觉词语学习测试的识别记忆子测试和受控口语联想测试。AD组在口语联想测试中表现更好,而SIVD组在识别记忆测试中表现更好。

结论

使用这两项神经心理学测试可以高度准确地区分可能患有AD和可能患有SIVD的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验