Joukhadar C, Klein N, Mader R M, Schrolnberger C, Rizovski B, Heere-Ress E, Pehamberger H, Strauchmann N, Jansen B, Müller M
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Clinical Pharmacokinetics, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria.
Cancer. 2001 Oct 15;92(8):2190-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011015)92:8<2190::aid-cncr1562>3.0.co;2-2.
Dacarbazine has been on the market for approximately 3 decades but remains the most effective single agent available for the therapy of metastatic malignant melanoma (MMM). Most MMMs, however, respond poorly to dacarbazine therapy. Apart from tumor resistance at a molecular level, several studies support the notion that therapeutic failure in tumor therapy also might be attributed to an impaired transcapillary drug transfer.
On the basis of this hypothesis, the authors measured intratumor transcapillary transfer rates of dacarbazine and its active metabolite 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (AIC) by in vivo microdialysis after intravenous administration of dacarbazine at doses of 200 mg/m(2) to 1000 mg/m(2) (n = 7) in patients suffering from MMM.
For all doses, area under the concentration curve (AUC) values for dacarbazine and AIC were not significantly different between plasma and tumor interstitium with AUC(tumor)/AUC(plasma) ratios of 0.97 +/- 0.08 (mean +/- standard error of the mean) for dacarbazine and 0.76 +/- 0.22 for AIC. AUC(0-240) values for dacarbazine and AIC measured in plasma correlated closely with corresponding AUC(0-240)values measured in the interstitium of MMMs with values of r(s) = 0.82 (P = 0.042) and r(s) = 0.90 (P = 0.037), respectively.
The results of this study indicate favorable tumor penetration characteristics of dacarbazine and its active metabolite AIC. The relative lack of response to antineoplastic therapy with dacarbazine, thus might be explained by resistance of melanoma cells at a molecular level rather than by an inability of dacarbazine and AIC to penetrate into the interstitium of MMM.
达卡巴嗪已上市约30年,但仍是转移性恶性黑色素瘤(MMM)治疗中最有效的单一药物。然而,大多数MMM对达卡巴嗪治疗反应不佳。除了分子水平的肿瘤耐药性外,多项研究支持肿瘤治疗中的治疗失败也可能归因于跨毛细血管药物转运受损这一观点。
基于这一假设,作者在200 mg/m²至1000 mg/m²剂量(n = 7)静脉注射达卡巴嗪后,通过体内微透析测量了MMM患者肿瘤内达卡巴嗪及其活性代谢物5-氨基咪唑-4-甲酰胺(AIC)的跨毛细血管转运速率。
对于所有剂量,达卡巴嗪和AIC的浓度曲线下面积(AUC)值在血浆和肿瘤间质之间无显著差异,达卡巴嗪的AUC(肿瘤)/AUC(血浆)比值为0.97±0.08(平均值±平均标准误差),AIC为0.76±0.22。血浆中测量的达卡巴嗪和AIC的AUC(0 - 240)值与MMM间质中测量的相应AUC(0 - 240)值密切相关,r(s)值分别为0.82(P = 0.042)和0.90(P = 0.037)。
本研究结果表明达卡巴嗪及其活性代谢物AIC具有良好的肿瘤渗透特性。因此,达卡巴嗪抗肿瘤治疗反应相对不足可能是由于黑色素瘤细胞在分子水平的耐药性,而非达卡巴嗪和AIC无法渗透到MMM间质中。