Vizcaíno N, Kittelberger R, Cloeckaert A, Marín C M, Fernández-Lago L
Departamento de Microbiología y Genética, Edificio Departmental, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Infect Immun. 2001 Nov;69(11):7020-8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.11.7020-7028.2001.
The gene coding for the major outer membrane protein Omp31 was sequenced in five Brucella species and their biovars. Although the omp31 genes appeared to be highly conserved in the genus Brucella, nine nucleotide substitutions were detected in the gene of Brucella ovis compared to that of Brucella melitensis. As shown by differential binding properties of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to the two Brucella species, these nucleotide substitutions result in different antigenic properties of Omp31. The antigenic differences were also evidenced when sera from B. ovis-infected rams were tested by Western blotting with the recombinant B. melitensis or B. ovis Omp31 proteins. Twelve available sera reacted with recombinant B. ovis Omp31, but only four of them reacted with recombinant B. melitensis Omp31. These results validate previous evidence for the potential of Omp31 as a diagnostic antigen for B. ovis infection in rams and demonstrate that B. ovis Omp31, instead of B. melitensis Omp31, should be used to evaluate this point. The antigenic differences between the B. melitensis and B. ovis Omp31 proteins should also be taken into account when Omp31 is evaluated as a candidate for the development of subcellular vaccines against B. ovis infection. No reactivity against recombinant B. melitensis Omp31 was detected, by Western blotting, with sera from B. melitensis-infected sheep. Accordingly, Omp31 does not seem to be a good diagnostic antigen for B. melitensis infections in sheep. Two immunodominant regions were identified on the B. ovis Omp31 protein by using recombinant DNA techniques and specific MAbs. Sera from B. ovis-infected rams that reacted with the recombinant protein were tested by Western blotting against one of these immunodominant regions shown to be exposed at the bacterial surface. Only 4 of the 12 sera reacted, but with strong intensity.
对五个布鲁氏菌物种及其生物变种中编码主要外膜蛋白Omp31的基因进行了测序。尽管omp31基因在布鲁氏菌属中似乎高度保守,但与羊种布鲁氏菌相比,绵羊布鲁氏菌基因中检测到九个核苷酸替换。如单克隆抗体(MAb)对这两种布鲁氏菌的不同结合特性所示,这些核苷酸替换导致Omp31具有不同的抗原特性。当用重组羊种布鲁氏菌或绵羊布鲁氏菌Omp31蛋白进行蛋白质印迹法检测绵羊布鲁氏菌感染公羊的血清时,也证明了抗原差异。12份可用血清与重组绵羊布鲁氏菌Omp31反应,但其中只有4份与重组羊种布鲁氏菌Omp31反应。这些结果证实了之前关于Omp31作为公羊绵羊布鲁氏菌感染诊断抗原潜力的证据,并表明应该使用绵羊布鲁氏菌Omp31而非羊种布鲁氏菌Omp31来评估这一点。在评估Omp31作为抗绵羊布鲁氏菌感染亚细胞疫苗开发候选物时,也应考虑羊种布鲁氏菌和绵羊布鲁氏菌Omp31蛋白之间的抗原差异。通过蛋白质印迹法,未检测到羊种布鲁氏菌感染绵羊的血清与重组羊种布鲁氏菌Omp31的反应。因此,Omp31似乎不是绵羊羊种布鲁氏菌感染的良好诊断抗原。通过使用重组DNA技术和特异性单克隆抗体,在绵羊布鲁氏菌Omp31蛋白上鉴定出两个免疫显性区域。用蛋白质印迹法对与重组蛋白反应的绵羊布鲁氏菌感染公羊的血清进行检测,以检测其中一个显示暴露于细菌表面的免疫显性区域。12份血清中只有4份有反应,但反应强度很强。