Suppr超能文献

对提取物不同稀释度进行的定量气相色谱 - 嗅觉测定法。四种优质西班牙陈年红葡萄酒香气特征的关键差异。

Quantitative gas chromatography-olfactometry carried out at different dilutions of an extract. Key differences in the odor profiles of four high-quality Spanish aged red wines.

作者信息

Ferreira V, Aznar M, López R, Cacho J

机构信息

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2001 Oct;49(10):4818-24. doi: 10.1021/jf010283u.

Abstract

Four Spanish aged red wines made in different wine-making areas have been extracted, and the extracts and their 1:5, 1:50, and 1:500 dilutions have been analyzed by a gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) approach in which three judges evaluated odor intensity on a four-point scale. Sixty-nine different odor regions were detected in the GC-O profiles of wines, 63 of which could be identified. GC-O data have been processed to calculate averaged flavor dilution factors (FD). Different ANOVA strategies have been further applied on FD and on intensity data to check for significant differences among wines and to assess the effects of dilution and the judge. Data show that FD and the average intensity of the odorants are strongly correlated (r(2) = 0.892). However, the measurement of intensity represents a quantitative advantage in terms of detecting differences. For some odorants, dilution exerts a critical role in the detection of differences. Significant differences among wines have been found in 30 of the 69 odorants detected in the experiment. Most of these differences are introduced by grape compounds such as methyl benzoate and terpenols, by compounds released by the wood, such as furfural, (Z)-whiskey lactone, Furaneol, 4-propylguaiacol, eugenol, 4-ethylphenol, 2,6-dimethoxyphenol, isoeugenol, and ethyl vanillate, by compounds formed by lactic acid bacteria, such as 2,3-butanedione and acetoine, or by compounds formed during the oxidative storage of wines, such as methional, sotolon, o-aminoacetophenone, and phenylacetic acid. The most important differences from a quantitative point of view are due to 2-methyl-3-mercaptofuran, 4-propylguaiacol, 2,6-dimethoxyphenol, and isoeugenol.

摘要

选取了产自不同酿酒地区的四种西班牙老年份红葡萄酒进行萃取,并采用气相色谱 - 嗅觉测定法(GC - O)对提取物及其1:5、1:50和1:500稀释液进行分析,由三名评判员按照四分制对气味强度进行评估。在葡萄酒的GC - O图谱中检测到69个不同的气味区域,其中63个可以被识别。已对GC - O数据进行处理以计算平均风味稀释因子(FD)。进一步对FD和强度数据应用不同的方差分析策略,以检验葡萄酒之间的显著差异,并评估稀释和评判员的影响。数据表明,FD与气味物质的平均强度密切相关(r(2) = 0.892)。然而,强度测量在检测差异方面具有定量优势。对于某些气味物质,稀释在差异检测中起着关键作用。在实验检测到的69种气味物质中,有30种在葡萄酒之间存在显著差异。这些差异大多由葡萄化合物(如苯甲酸甲酯和萜烯醇)、木材释放的化合物(如糠醛、(Z)-威士忌内酯、呋喃酮、4 - 丙基愈创木酚、丁香酚、4 - 乙基苯酚、2,6 - 二甲氧基苯酚、异丁香酚和香草酸乙酯)、乳酸菌形成的化合物(如2,3 - 丁二酮和乙偶姻)或葡萄酒氧化储存过程中形成的化合物(如甲硫醇、 sotolon、邻氨基苯乙酮和苯乙酸)导致。从定量角度来看,最重要的差异归因于2 - 甲基 - 3 - 巯基呋喃、4 - 丙基愈创木酚、2,6 - 二甲氧基苯酚和异丁香酚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验