Tsolaki M, Kokarida K, Iakovidou V, Stilopoulos E, Meimaris J, Kazis A
3rd Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2001 Sep-Oct;16(5):268-78. doi: 10.1177/153331750101600512.
To determine the prevalence and clinical correlates of extrapyramidal signs (EPS) in outpatients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD); to examine the appearance of EPS in association with the first symptom that led the patient or family to ask for medical help; to examine the association of the prevalence of EPS with gender, age at onset of the disease, duration of the disease, severity of dementia, functional disability, and potential use of neuroleptics; and to address the issue of the possible role of EPS as a predictive factor for the clinical course of the disease.
We examined 126 patients meeting NINCDS-ADRDA* criteria for probable AD and 29 healthy, nondementia controls of comparable age and gender. Thirteen of the patients taking neuroleptics at the time of the examination were excluded from the main study group and formed a separate subgroup of AD/neuroleptics-positive. Twenty-eight of the AD/neuroleptics-free patients were re-examined during an 18-month period in order to determine the possible role of EPS as a predictive factor of the clinical course of the disease.
Only 8 percent of the AD/neuroleptics-free patients were free of EPS, while the corresponding percentage in the control group was 61.5 percent. The most common types of EPS presented in the patient group were hypomimia ([facial mask] 60 percent), difficulty in talking (53.66 percent), bradykinesia (51.4 percent), postural instability (47.33 percent), abnormal gait (34.66), and rigidity (26 percent), respectively. No significant differences were found when examining for the presence of resting tremor, other tremors, dystonias, and dyskinesias. With regard to the presence of EPS and the first symptom, no significant difference was found among patients whose first complaint was memory disorder (probable AD) and patients with other symptoms. When examining the association between the prevalence of EPS and gender or age at onset of the disease, no special correlation was detected. However, such a correlation was found between the prevalence of EPS and duration of the disease, as indicated by the fact that EPS appear in 78.9 percent of the patients with a duration of illness less than two years, but in 97 percent of the patients with a corresponding duration of two years or more. The mean duration of the disease in patients appearing with EPS is found to be 2.68 +/- 1.98 years. The presence of EPS increases proportionally with the progression of the disease and cognitive and functional decline. Patients with poor results in the MMSE (score of less than 11) appear to present EPS at a greater percentage than those with better performance on the examination (MMSE scores greater than 11). With regard to the association between EPS and functional ability in AD, it seems that the presence of EPS imposes difficulties in daily activities, as seen by the fact that patients with EPS have lower FRSSD scores (mean +/- SD: 14.87 +/- 10.53) than patients without EPS (5 +/- 2.58). After controlling for duration of the disease, the use of neuroleptics is found to influence the appearance of EPS in patients with AD. Almost all of the patients AD/neuroleptics-positive patients presented EPS (100 percent), while 92 percent of the AD/neuroleptics-free patients manifested such symptoms. Finally, we re-evaluated 28 patients, who were part of the initial AD/neuroleptics-free group, in order to determine whether the appearance of EPS could have prognostic value for the clinical course of the disease. Patients who presented EPS at initial examination appeared to deteriorate faster, mainly cognitively, but also functionally. The mean decrease in MMSE scores in patients with EPS was found to be 2.65 +/- 3.46; while in patients without EPS at initial visit, MMSE scores were 0.63 +/- 3.88. The functional decline seems to be less influenced by the presence of EPS. The corresponding mean decrease in FRSSD scores of the two groups was 2.1 +/- 5.55 and 1.8 +/- 2.1, respectively.
确定可能患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)的门诊患者锥体外系症状(EPS)的患病率及其临床相关因素;研究EPS与导致患者或家属寻求医疗帮助的首发症状之间的关系;研究EPS患病率与性别、发病年龄、病程、痴呆严重程度、功能残疾以及是否可能使用抗精神病药物之间的关联;探讨EPS作为疾病临床进程预测因素的可能作用。
我们检查了126例符合NINCDS-ADRDA*标准的可能患有AD的患者以及29名年龄和性别匹配的健康非痴呆对照者。检查时正在服用抗精神病药物的13例患者被排除在主要研究组之外,组成了一个单独的AD/抗精神病药物阳性亚组。对28例未服用抗精神病药物的AD患者在18个月期间进行了重新检查,以确定EPS作为疾病临床进程预测因素的可能作用。
未服用抗精神病药物的AD患者中仅有8%没有EPS,而对照组相应比例为61.5%。患者组中出现的最常见EPS类型分别为表情减少(“面具脸”60%)、言语困难(53.66%)、运动迟缓(51.4%)、姿势不稳(47.33%)、异常步态(34.66%)和肌强直(26%)。在检查静止性震颤、其他震颤、肌张力障碍和运动障碍的存在情况时未发现显著差异。关于EPS的存在与首发症状,首发症状为记忆障碍(可能患有AD)的患者与有其他症状的患者之间未发现显著差异。在检查EPS患病率与性别或发病年龄之间的关联时,未发现特殊相关性。然而,EPS患病率与病程之间存在这种相关性,病程小于两年的患者中78.9%出现EPS,而病程两年或更长的患者中这一比例为97%。出现EPS的患者的平均病程为2.68±1.98年。EPS的出现随着疾病进展以及认知和功能衰退成比例增加。简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)得分低(低于11分)的患者出现EPS的比例似乎高于检查表现较好(MMSE得分大于11分)的患者。关于AD中EPS与功能能力之间的关联,似乎EPS的存在给日常活动带来困难,因为有EPS的患者功能评定量表(FRSSD)得分(平均±标准差:14.87±10.53)低于无EPS的患者(5±2.58)。在控制病程后,发现使用抗精神病药物会影响AD患者EPS的出现。几乎所有AD/抗精神病药物阳性患者都出现了EPS(100%),而未服用抗精神病药物的AD患者中有92%出现了此类症状。最后,我们重新评估了最初未服用抗精神病药物组中的28例患者,以确定EPS的出现是否对疾病临床进程具有预后价值。初检时出现EPS的患者似乎恶化更快,主要是认知方面,但功能方面也是如此。发现有EPS的患者MMSE得分平均下降2.65±3.46;而初诊时无EPS的患者MMSE得分是0.63±3.88。功能衰退似乎受EPS存在的影响较小。两组FRSSD得分相应的平均下降分别为2.1±5.55和1.8±2.1。