• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于肿瘤遗传学的培训对全科医生咨询技能的效果:一项随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of oncogenetics training on general practitioners' consultation skills: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

1] Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [2] Department of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2014 Jan;16(1):45-52. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.69. Epub 2013 May 30.

DOI:10.1038/gim.2013.69
PMID:23722870
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3914027/
Abstract

PURPOSE

General practitioners are increasingly called upon to deliver genetic services and could play a key role in translating potentially life-saving advancements in oncogenetic technologies to patient care. If general practitioners are to make an effective contribution in this area, their genetics competencies need to be upgraded. The aim of this study was to investigate whether oncogenetics training for general practitioners improves their genetic consultation skills.

METHODS

In this pragmatic, blinded, randomized controlled trial, the intervention consisted of a 4-h training (December 2011 and April 2012), covering oncogenetic consultation skills (family history, familial risk assessment, and efficient referral), attitude (medical ethical issues), and clinical knowledge required in primary-care consultations. Outcomes were measured using observation checklists by unannounced standardized patients and self-reported questionnaires.

RESULTS

Of 88 randomized general practitioners who initially agreed to participate, 56 completed all measurements. Key consultation skills significantly and substantially improved; regression coefficients after intervention were equivalent to 0.34 and 0.28 at 3-month follow-up, indicating a moderate effect size. Satisfaction and perceived applicability of newly learned skills were highly scored.

CONCLUSION

The general practitioner-specific training proved to be a feasible, satisfactory, and clinically applicable method to improve oncogenetics consultation skills and could be used as an educational framework to inform future training activities with the ultimate aim of improving medical care.

摘要

目的

全科医生越来越多地被要求提供遗传服务,并且可以在将肿瘤遗传学技术的潜在救生进展转化为患者护理方面发挥关键作用。如果全科医生要在这一领域做出有效的贡献,他们的遗传学能力需要得到提升。本研究旨在探讨对全科医生进行肿瘤遗传学培训是否能提高他们的遗传咨询技能。

方法

在这项实用、盲法、随机对照试验中,干预措施包括 4 小时的培训(2011 年 12 月和 2012 年 4 月),涵盖肿瘤遗传咨询技能(家族史、家族风险评估和有效转诊)、态度(医学伦理问题)和初级保健咨询中所需的临床知识。通过未事先通知的标准化患者的观察检查表和自我报告问卷来衡量结果。

结果

最初同意参与的 88 名随机分配的全科医生中,有 56 名完成了所有的测量。主要咨询技能显著且大幅度提高;干预后的回归系数在 3 个月随访时相当于 0.34 和 0.28,表明具有中等的效果大小。对新学到的技能的满意度和可应用性评价很高。

结论

针对全科医生的特定培训被证明是一种可行、满意和临床适用的方法,可以提高肿瘤遗传学咨询技能,并可用作告知未来培训活动的教育框架,最终目的是改善医疗保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819e/3914027/8017b1f6d533/gim201369f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819e/3914027/db568cb309a7/gim201369f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819e/3914027/8017b1f6d533/gim201369f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819e/3914027/db568cb309a7/gim201369f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819e/3914027/8017b1f6d533/gim201369f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of oncogenetics training on general practitioners' consultation skills: a randomized controlled trial.基于肿瘤遗传学的培训对全科医生咨询技能的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Genet Med. 2014 Jan;16(1):45-52. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.69. Epub 2013 May 30.
2
Effect of comprehensive oncogenetics training interventions for general practitioners, evaluated at multiple performance levels.针对全科医生的综合肿瘤遗传学培训干预措施的效果,在多个绩效水平上进行评估。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0122648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122648. eCollection 2015.
3
Sustained effects of online genetics education: a randomized controlled trial on oncogenetics.在线遗传学教育的持续效果:一项关于肿瘤遗传学的随机对照试验。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Mar;22(3):310-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.163. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
4
The uncertain consultation and patient satisfaction: the impact of patients' illness perceptions and a randomized controlled trial on the training of physicians' communication skills.不确定的会诊与患者满意度:患者疾病认知的影响以及一项关于医生沟通技能培训的随机对照试验
Psychosom Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;67(6):897-905. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000188403.94327.5b.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
Assessment of the interest of the geriatric oncology consultation among French general practitioners.法国全科医生对老年肿瘤学会诊的兴趣评估。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2016 Jan;7(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2015.10.184. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study.优先考虑普通医生的未来遗传学教育:德尔菲研究。
Genet Med. 2012 Mar;14(3):323-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.15. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
9
Effectiveness of a peer-mediated educational intervention in improving general practitioner diagnostic assessment and management of dementia: a cluster randomised controlled trial.同伴介导的教育干预对改善全科医生痴呆诊断评估与管理的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e021125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021125.
10
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.

引用本文的文献

1
Building capacity for genomics in primary care: a scoping review of practitioner attitudes, education needs, and enablers.初级保健领域基因组学能力建设:从业者态度、教育需求及促进因素的范围综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 30;12:1577958. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1577958. eCollection 2025.
2
Synthesis of Existent Oncology Curricula for Primary Care Providers: A Scoping Review With a Global Equity Lens.基层医疗照护者现有肿瘤学课程的综合:从全球公平视角进行的范围综述。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 May;9:e2200298. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00298.
3
General practitioners' (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Family history: still relevant in the genomics era.家族史:在基因组学时代仍然重要。
Cleve Clin J Med. 2012 May;79(5):331-6. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.79a.11065.
2
Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study.优先考虑普通医生的未来遗传学教育:德尔菲研究。
Genet Med. 2012 Mar;14(3):323-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.15. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
3
Genetic testing for familial/hereditary breast cancer-comparison of guidelines and recommendations from the UK, France, the Netherlands and Germany.家族性/遗传性乳腺癌的基因检测——英国、法国、荷兰和德国指南与建议的比较
全科医生(GP)对临床遗传服务的经验、态度和需求:系统评价。
Fam Med Community Health. 2022 Nov;10(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001515.
4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):258-271. doi: 10.5737/23688076322258271. eCollection 2022 Spring.
5
Issues associated with a hereditary risk of cancer: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of nurses in oncology settings.与癌症遗传风险相关的问题:肿瘤科室护士的知识、态度和行为
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):272-285. doi: 10.5737/23688076322272285. eCollection 2022 Spring.
6
Practitioners' Confidence and Desires for Education in Cardiovascular and Sudden Cardiac Death Genetics.心血管病和心源性猝死遗传学教育的从业者信心和需求。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):e023763. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023763. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
7
Hereditary colorectal cancer screening: A 10-year longitudinal cohort study following an educational intervention.遗传性结直肠癌筛查:一项教育干预后的10年纵向队列研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Sep 23;20:101189. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101189. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 3: eHealth education in primary care.系列文章:初级保健中的电子健康。第 3 部分:初级保健中的电子健康教育。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):108-118. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2020.1797675.
9
A systematic review of communication interventions to help healthcare professionals discuss genetic testing for breast cancer.系统评价帮助医疗保健专业人员讨论乳腺癌基因检测的沟通干预措施。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug;183(1):9-21. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05741-z. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
Informing Integration of Genomic Medicine Into Primary Care: An Assessment of Current Practice, Attitudes, and Desired Resources.告知将基因组医学纳入初级保健:对当前实践、态度和所需资源的评估。
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 21;10:1189. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01189. eCollection 2019.
J Community Genet. 2011 Jun;2(2):53-69. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0042-4. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
4
Factors influencing consultation to discuss family history of cancer by asymptomatic patients in primary care.影响初级保健中无症状患者就癌症家族史进行咨询的因素。
J Community Genet. 2011 Mar;2(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0034-4. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
5
Clinical utility of family history for cancer screening and referral in primary care: a report from the Family Healthware Impact Trial.家族史在初级保健中的癌症筛查和转介中的临床应用:来自家庭健康影响试验的报告。
Genet Med. 2011 Nov;13(11):956-65. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182241d88.
6
CPD and KT: models used and opportunities for synergy.持续专业发展与知识转化:所使用的模型及协同增效的机会
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011 Summer;31(3):167-73. doi: 10.1002/chp.20123.
7
GenetiKit: a randomized controlled trial to enhance delivery of genetics services by family physicians.GenetiKit:一项通过家庭医生增强遗传服务提供的随机对照试验。
Fam Pract. 2011 Dec;28(6):615-23. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr040. Epub 2011 Jul 10.
8
Do GPs respond to postal questionnaire surveys? A comprehensive review of primary care literature.全科医生是否会回应邮寄问卷调查报告?初级保健文献综述。
Fam Pract. 2011 Aug;28(4):461-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr001. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
9
Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives.遗传教育需求和初级保健中的遗传学作用:多视角的焦点小组研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Feb 17;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-5.
10
Genetics in family health care: putting it into action.家庭医疗保健中的遗传学:付诸实践。
J Fam Health Care. 2010;20(5):155-7.