Suppr超能文献

[关于《证类本草》与《名医别录》历史关系的差异分析]

[Differential analyses on the historical relationship between Zhenglei bencao (herbology of classified syndromes) and Mingyi Bie Lu (appendant records of famous physicians)].

作者信息

Shang Z

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi. 1994;24(1):38-40.

Abstract

This author claims that, by using the approach of "inclusion of all canons", Tao Hongjing incorporated the 365 kinds of drugs from the earliest canon "Shen Nong's Herbological Canon" with another 365 kinds of "subordinated drugs from famous physicians", including Wu Pu and Li Dangzhi etc. to compile his 7-volume "Collected variorum of herbological canon". Owing to the changes and modifications made on the term "subordinated drugs from famous physicians" by the prefaces of herbological works of successive ages, the misunderstandings that the other 365 appendant kinds of drug were derived from an available Ming Yi Bie Lu and that the preface by Tao Yinju of the Liang Dynasty in Zhenglei Bencao was the preface of the book Mingyi Bielu were thuw formed.

摘要

这位作者声称,陶弘景采用“诸家合录”的方法,将最早的典籍《神农本草经》中的365种药物与另外365种“名医别录药”(包括吴普、李当之等所记载的药物)合编为七卷本的《本草经集注》。由于历代本草著作的序文对“名医别录药”这一说法有所改动,遂形成了另外365种附药出自现存《名医别录》以及《证类本草》中梁代陶隐居序是《名医别录》序的误解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验