Higgs W
Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine, Oxford, UK.
Soc Hist Med. 1996 Dec;9(3):409-26. doi: 10.1093/shm/9.3.409.
This paper examines the relationship between intellectual debate, technologies for analysing information, and the production of statistics in the General Register Office (GRO) in London in the early twentieth century. It argues that controversy between eugenicists and public health officials respecting the cause and effect of class-specific variations in fertility led to the introduction of questions in the 1911 census on marital fertility. The increasing complexity of the census necessitated a shift from manual to mechanised forms of data processing within the GRO. The subsequent increase in processing power allowed the GRO to make important changes to the medical and demographic statistics it published in the annual Reports of the Registrar General. These included substituting administrative sanitary districts for registration districts as units of analysis, consistently transferring deaths in institutions back to place of residence, and abstracting deaths according to the International List of Causes of Death.
本文考察了20世纪初伦敦总登记处(GRO)的学术辩论、信息分析技术与统计数据生成之间的关系。文章认为,优生学家与公共卫生官员之间就特定阶层生育率差异的因果关系展开的争论,导致了1911年人口普查中引入了关于婚内生育的问题。人口普查日益复杂,使得总登记处的数据处理方式从手工转向机械化。随后处理能力的提升,使总登记处在其发布的《总登记官年度报告》中对医学和人口统计数据做出了重要更改。这些更改包括用行政区卫生区取代登记区作为分析单位,将机构内死亡人员的死亡地点统一转回居住地,并根据《国际死亡原因清单》提取死亡数据。