Nerlich B, Clarke D D
Department of Psychology, University of Nottingham, England.
Hist Psychol. 1998 Aug;1(3):179-204. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.1.3.179.
Wilhelm Wundt's influence on the development of linguistics and psychology was pervasive. The foundations for this web of influence on the sciences of mind and language were laid down in Wundt's own research program, which was quite different from other attempts at founding a new psychology, as it was deeply rooted in German philosophy. This resulted in certain gaps in Wundt's conception of mind and language. These gaps provoked a double repudiation of Wundt's theories, by linguists and psychologists. The psychological repudiation has been studied by historians of psychology, and the linguistic repudiation has been studied by historians of linguistics. The intent of this article is to bring the linguistic repudiation to the attention of historians of psychology, especially the one outlined by two important figures in the history of psychology: Karl Buhler and George Mead.
威廉·冯特对语言学和心理学发展的影响极为深远。这种对心智与语言科学产生广泛影响的基础,是在冯特自己的研究计划中奠定的,该计划与其他创立新心理学的尝试截然不同,因为它深深植根于德国哲学。这导致冯特在心智与语言概念上存在某些空白。这些空白引发了语言学家和心理学家对冯特理论的双重否定。心理学史学家研究了心理学界的否定,语言史学家研究了语言学界的否定。本文旨在让心理学史学家关注语言学界的否定,尤其是心理学史上两位重要人物卡尔·比勒和乔治·米德所概述的那种否定。