De Kock Liesbet
Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
J Hist Behav Sci. 2018 Oct;54(4):272-292. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.21929.
In the wake of the critical reorientation in the historiography of psychology, a number of scholars challenged the one-sided structuralist and positivist interpretation of Wilhelm Wundt's work. This paper aims at contributing to these recent efforts, by providing an analysis of the way in which Wundt's apperceptionism conditioned his account of the relation between thought and speech, and by extrapolation, of disorganized thought and speech. While Wundt's pivotal role in the development of the psychology of language is relatively well-known, discussions on this part of his theorizing tend to focus exclusively on his gestural or motor account of language. This obliterates the complex theoretical background of Wundt's theory of language and speech, as well as its systematic place within his psychological system. Highlighting this neglected dimension of Wundt's theorizing, however, could open up a new horizon of pressing research questions in the historiography of psychology.
随着心理学史学的批判性重新定位，一些学者对威廉·冯特著作的片面结构主义和实证主义解释提出了质疑。本文旨在通过分析冯特的统觉主义对他关于思维与言语关系的论述，以及由此推断出的混乱思维与言语的影响方式，为这些近期的研究努力做出贡献。虽然冯特在语言心理学发展中的关键作用相对广为人知，但关于他这部分理论的讨论往往只集中在他对语言的手势或运动方面的论述上。这掩盖了冯特语言和言语理论的复杂理论背景，以及它在他的心理学体系中的系统地位。然而，突出冯特理论中这一被忽视的维度，可能会为心理学史学中一系列紧迫的研究问题开辟一个新的视野。
