Qiao H, Qiao Y, Li H
Shandong University of TCM, Jinan 250014.
Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi. 1999 Oct;29(4):239-41.
The problem is probed on the clues provided by Si ku ti yao zheng (Analysis on Summary of Books in Four Parts). It is claimed that the Wang bing () recommended by Wei Kang and that recommended by Yuwen Rong in Yu Jiaxi's work refer to the same person, both are identical to the time of the author of Su wen. Further, the time of the above 2 Wang Bing(s) and the Wang Bing recorded in lie nu zhuan (Biongraphies of chaste women) as the son of Wang Lin, are also overlapped with the time of the author of Su wen. It is possible that they are the same person. However, the details of the Wang Bing mentioned in Lang guan shi zhu ti ming (inscription for Lang guan Stone Pillar) is unknown. Again, it is unlikely that the Wang Bing () is the author of Su wen and can be only a farfetched analogy drawn after Su Fu's poet.
问题依据《四库提要正讹》所提供的线索进行探究。据称，魏康所提及的王冰（）与余嘉锡著作中宇文融所提及的王冰指的是同一人，二者均与《素问》作者所处时代相同。此外，上述两位王冰的时代与《列女传》中记载为王临之子的王冰的时代，也与《素问》作者的时代有重叠。他们有可能是同一人。然而，《郎官石柱题名》中提及的王冰的具体情况不明。再者，王冰（）不太可能是《素问》的作者，只能是在苏赋之后所作的牵强类比。
