Gradmann C
Institut for Geschichte der Medizin, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, Germany.
Sci Context. 2000 Spring;13(1):9-30. doi: 10.1017/s0269889700003707.
The text analyzes the related semantics of bacteriology and politics in imperial Germany. The rapid success of bacteriology in the 1880s and 1890s was due not least to the fact that scientific concepts of bacteria as "the smallest but most dangerous enemies of mankind" (R. Koch) resonated with contemporary ideas about political enemies. Bacteriological hygiene was expected to provide answers to social and political problems. At the same time metaphors borrowed from bacteriological terminology were incorporated into the political language of the time. While the "high command of our doctors" (F.J. Cohn) fought diseases, some contemporaries were identified with members of the evil species of "bacillus communis odii." Both imperialistic politics and bacteriological science relied on images of inferior and invisible but potent enemies. Both were able to increase their prestige via a mutual interchange of their vocabularies.
本文分析了德意志帝国时期细菌学与政治的相关语义。19世纪80年代和90年代细菌学的迅速成功,很大程度上归因于这样一个事实:细菌作为“人类最小但最危险的敌人”(R. 科赫)这一科学概念,与当时有关政治敌人的观念产生了共鸣。细菌学卫生学有望为社会和政治问题提供答案。与此同时,从细菌学术语中借用的隐喻被纳入了当时的政治语言。当“我们医生的最高指挥部”(F.J. 科恩)与疾病作斗争时,一些同时代的人被等同于“仇恨杆菌”这一邪恶物种的成员。帝国主义政治和细菌学都依赖于低等、无形但强大的敌人形象。两者都能够通过相互交流词汇来提升自己的威望。