• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然史与《百科全书》。

Natural history and the Encyclopedie.

作者信息

Llana J

机构信息

Humanities & Languages Department, State University of New York, College at Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA.

出版信息

J Hist Biol. 2000 Spring;33(1):1-25. doi: 10.1023/a:1004736103768.

DOI:10.1023/a:1004736103768
PMID:11624414
Abstract

The general popularity of natural history in the eighteenth century is mirrored in the frequency and importance of the more than 4,500 articles on natural history in the Encyclopedie. The main contributors to natural history were Daubenton, Diderot, Jaucourt and d'Holbach, but some of the key animating principles derive from Buffon, who wrote nothing specifically for the Encyclopedie. Still, a number of articles reflect his thinking, especially his antipathy toward Linnaeus. There was in principle a natural tie between encyclopedism, with its emphasis on connected knowledge, and the task of natural historians who concentrated on the relationships among living forms. Both the encyclopedists and the natural historians aimed at a sweeping overview of knowledge, and we see that Diderot's discussions of the encyclopedia were apparently informed by his reading of natural history. Most of the articles on natural history drew from traditional sources, but there are differences in emphasis and choice of subject, depending upon the author. Diderot's 300 contributions are often practical, interesting, and depend upon accounts from other parts of the world. Jaucourt, who wrote more articles on natural history than anyone else, followed in his foodsteps. Daubenton's 900 articles reflected a more narrow, professional approach. His contributions concluded for the most part with Volume 8, and Jaucourt carried on almost single-handedly after that. While staking out traditional ground (description, taxonomy) and advancing newer theoretical views linked with Buffon, natural history in the Encyclopedie avoided almost completely the sentimentalism concerning nature that developed after Rousseau.

摘要

18世纪博物学的广泛流行反映在《百科全书》中4500多篇关于博物学文章的数量和重要性上。博物学的主要贡献者有多邦东、狄德罗、雅库和霍尔巴赫,但一些关键的主导原则源自布丰,他并未专门为《百科全书》撰写文章。尽管如此,仍有一些文章反映了他的思想,尤其是他对林奈的反感。原则上,强调知识关联性的百科全书主义与专注于生物形态之间关系的博物学家的任务存在天然联系。百科全书编纂者和博物学家都旨在全面概述知识,我们可以看到狄德罗对百科全书的讨论显然受到了他对博物学阅读的影响。大多数关于博物学的文章都取材于传统资料,但根据作者不同,在重点和主题选择上存在差异。狄德罗的300篇稿件通常很实用、有趣,且依赖于来自世界其他地区的记载。雅库撰写的关于博物学的文章比其他任何人都多,他追随狄德罗的脚步。多邦东的900篇文章反映了一种更狭隘的专业方法。他的贡献大多在第8卷结束,之后几乎是雅库独自继续相关工作。在占据传统领域(描述、分类学)并推进与布丰相关的更新的理论观点的同时,《百科全书》中的博物学几乎完全避免了卢梭之后发展起来的对自然的感伤主义。

相似文献

1
Natural history and the Encyclopedie.自然史与《百科全书》。
J Hist Biol. 2000 Spring;33(1):1-25. doi: 10.1023/a:1004736103768.
2
[Georges Louis Leclerc de Buffon (1701-1788). The main ideas of his science of life. On the tricentenary of the French naturalist's birthday].[乔治·路易·勒克莱尔·德·布丰(1701 - 1788)。他的生命科学主要思想。纪念这位法国博物学家诞辰三百周年]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2007;52(3-4):55-95.
3
Blindness and the age of enlightenment: Diderot's letter on the blind.盲目与启蒙时代:狄德罗的《论盲人》
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Jan;131(1):98-102. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.559.
4
History without time: Buffon's natural history as a nonmathematical physique.没有时间的历史:布丰的自然史作为一种非数学的自然哲学
Isis. 2010 Mar;101(1):30-61. doi: 10.1086/652688.
5
[Buffon, the director of 'Jardin du Roi' in the 1700s].[布丰,18世纪“皇家植物园”的园长]
Dan Medicinhist Arbog. 2008;36:57-96.
6
[Buffon (1707-1788)].[布丰(1707 - 1788)]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2008 Mar-Apr;136(3-4):196-9.
7
[Health in Diderot's Encyclopedia].[狄德罗《百科全书》中的健康内容]
Clio Med. 1995;31:117-40.
8
Migraine in Diderot's Encyclopedia: an historical mainstream text.狄德罗《百科全书》中的偏头痛:一篇历史主流文本。
Cephalalgia. 2005 Dec;25(12):1173-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.00989.x.
9
[An encyclopedia for the empire].[帝国百科全书]
Ber Wiss. 2008 Mar;31(1):11-28. doi: 10.1002/bewi.200701326.
10
Medicine in the Encyclopédie (1751-1780) of Diderot and d'Alembert.狄德罗和达朗贝尔的《百科全书》(1751-1780 年)中的医学。
J Nephrol. 2011 May-Jun;24 Suppl 17:S12-24. doi: 10.5301/JN.2011.6485.

本文引用的文献

1
Buffon and Daubenton: divergent traditions within the Histoire naturelle.布丰和多邦东:《自然史》中的不同传统
Isis. 1975 Mar;66(231):63-74. doi: 10.1086/351376.
2
The Buffon-Linnaeus controversy.布丰-林奈之争
Isis. 1976 Sep;67(238):356-75. doi: 10.1086/351629.