López Terrada M L
Instituto de Estudios Documentales e Históricos sobre la Ciencia, Universidad de Valencia.
Dynamis. 1996;16:21-42.
We present a bibliography comprising 253 references available to the present time on works dealing directly or indirectly with the Royal Protomedicato. A wide range of criteria were used to search the most commonly used bibliographic sources and to apply indirect methods, in view of the dispersion of relevant studies, and the lack of bibliographies for Spanish historical-medical works from certain decades. We offer a general analysis of the literature, and sketch out the major historiographical problems faced in studies of this institution, ie, the scarcity of sources, the predominance of legislative sources, the changes in geographical areas under the authority of the Castilian Protomedicato and differences between protophysicians and the Protomedicato.
我们列出了一份包含253篇参考文献的书目,这些文献涵盖了目前可获取的、直接或间接涉及皇家医师公会的著作。鉴于相关研究的分散性,以及某些几十年间西班牙历史医学著作缺乏书目索引的情况,我们运用了广泛的标准来搜索最常用的书目来源并采用间接方法。我们对这些文献进行了总体分析,并概述了在该机构研究中面临的主要史学问题,即资料稀缺、立法资料占主导、卡斯蒂利亚医师公会管辖地理区域的变化以及医师与医师公会之间的差异。