Jacobina R R
Universidade de Bahia, Brasil.
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 1999;6(3):609-30.
This brief historical analysis of the field of epistemology begins with its initial, speculative phase, moving on to the traditional normative model and continuing through contemporary lines, which are referred to here as 'historical-interpretative'. Common to the latter is harsh criticism of the traditional paradigm, whose shortcomings include not only the limitations of 'logical falsification' and 'empirical verification' but also the prescriptive rigidity of normative meta-science, deemed incompatible with this century's scientific advances. The article analyzes Kuhn's contribution in greater detail, highlighting his original concepts and his redefinitions of earlier concepts and models. To illustrate, some of his categories are used in an analysis of the discovery of the DNA structure. This exploration of the Kuhnian model also makes reference to certain stances taken by normative and post-Kuhnian epistemologists, especially in relation to the social sciences and application of the model to other areas of knowledge.
对认识论领域的这一简要历史分析始于其最初的思辨阶段,接着是传统规范模型,并延续至当代脉络,这里将其称为“历史诠释性”脉络。后者的共同之处在于对传统范式的严厉批判,传统范式的缺点不仅包括“逻辑证伪”和“经验证实”的局限性,还包括规范元科学的规定性僵化,这种僵化被认为与本世纪的科学进步不相容。本文更详细地分析了库恩的贡献,突出了他的原创概念以及他对早期概念和模型的重新定义。为作说明,他的一些范畴被用于对DNA结构发现的分析。对库恩模型的这一探究还提及了规范认识论者和后库恩认识论者所采取的某些立场,特别是在社会科学方面以及该模型在其他知识领域的应用方面。