Suppr超能文献

[托马斯·S·库恩的方法论与医学史(关于库恩著作波兰语版出版30周年的评论)]

[T.S. Kuhn's methodology and the history of medicine (remarks on the 30th anniversary of the publication of the Polish edition of Kuhn's work)].

作者信息

Plonka-Syroka B

出版信息

Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 1998;43(3-4):37-65.

Abstract

Ever since its publication in the book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), the conception developed by T.S. Kuhn has been the subject of much discussion in the works of philosophers and historians of science. The present author has attempted to look at Kuhn's conception, as presented in his 1962 book and in a number of additional papers contained in the volume The Essential Tension (Polish translation published in 1985 under the title Dwa bieguny. Tradycja i nowatorstwo w badaniach naukowych), from the point of view of its usefulness in studies on the history of medicine. Among the elements of Kuhn's model which could be used in the historiography of medicine, the author includes the concept of the history of science focused on reconstructing its real history. She discusses Kuhn's research directives and his views on the nature of scientific explanation. She finds Kuhn's concept of a crisis in science to be particularly useful in interpreting the changes in medical thought and practice. The author also believes that historians of medicine could draw in their research on Kuhn's views concerning the problem of choice of theory in scientific communities.

摘要

自从T.S. 库恩在《科学革命的结构》(1962年)一书中提出这一概念以来,它一直是科学哲学家和科学史学家著作中诸多讨论的主题。本文作者试图从其对医学史研究的有用性角度,审视库恩在其1962年著作以及收录于《必要的张力》(1985年波兰语译本以《两个方向:科学研究中的传统与创新》为题出版)中的若干论文中所阐述的概念。在库恩模型中可用于医学史编纂的要素中,作者纳入了专注于重构科学真实历史的科学史概念。她讨论了库恩的研究指南及其对科学解释本质的看法。她发现库恩的科学危机概念在解释医学思想和实践的变化方面特别有用。作者还认为,医学史学家在其研究中可以借鉴库恩关于科学共同体理论选择问题的观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验