The Budapest model of supervision has been left out from the renewed discussions and research projects. The author highlights some historical backgrounds in the development of the practice of supervision, which are connected with the organisational development of the international psychoanalytical movement. He explores Vilma Kovacs seminal paper on the Hungarian model of supervision. He points out that the therapeutic moment, due to the psychoanalytic technique, is unavoidable, and the different models offer only practical, but no optimal solutions to this inherent conflict. Changes in psychotherapy knowledge of candidates before entering psychoanalytic training, and other factors allow us to review the different models of supervision from a fresh point of view.
布达佩斯督导模式已被排除在重新展开的讨论和研究项目之外。作者着重介绍了督导实践发展中的一些历史背景,这些背景与国际精神分析运动的组织发展相关。他探讨了维尔玛·科瓦奇关于匈牙利督导模式的开创性论文。他指出,由于精神分析技术的缘故,治疗时刻不可避免,而不同的模式只为这一内在冲突提供了实际的而非最优的解决方案。候选人在进入精神分析培训之前心理治疗知识的变化以及其他因素,使我们能够从全新的角度审视不同的督导模式。