Suppr超能文献

[重复还是新的开始?论战后精神分析在西德的重新确立]

[A repetition or a new start? About the reinstalling of psychoanalysis in West Germany after the War].

作者信息

Lockot R

出版信息

Rev Int Hist Psychanal. 1988;1:117-31.

Abstract

The concessions which the psychoanalysts made to the Nazi regime wounded them in their psychoanalytical identity. Parallels are established here between the officialization of psychotherapy in National Socialist Germany and the attempts at officialization by the Schultz-Hencke neo-analytical circle. The behavior seems comparable, irrespective of political regimes. On the other hand, Müller-Braunschweig's effort to revive classical psychoanalysis is presented as specifically characterised by the reproduction of "places of disturbance" ("Störstellen") and is interpreted as an attempt to restore, through these repetitions, his damaged psychoanalytical identity. Thus appears the ambivalence of the officialization of psychoanalysis in a social system as an element within the psychoanalytical identity which constantly seeks to elude self-analysis.

摘要

精神分析学家们对纳粹政权做出的让步损害了他们的精神分析身份认同。本文将纳粹德国心理治疗的官方化与舒尔茨 - 亨克新分析圈子的官方化尝试进行了比较。无论政治体制如何,这种行为似乎都具有可比性。另一方面,米勒 - 布伦施魏格复兴经典精神分析的努力被描述为具有“干扰点”(“Störstellen”)再现的独特特征,并被解释为他试图通过这些重复来修复受损的精神分析身份认同。因此,精神分析在社会系统中的官方化呈现出一种矛盾性,它作为精神分析身份认同中的一个元素,不断试图逃避自我分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验