de Mijolla A
Rev Int Hist Psychanal. 1988;1:167-223.
France was affected by a deep psychoanalytic silence, both in theoretical and clinical fields, throughout the four years of German occupation. The psychoanalytic Institute closed its doors and the Revue française de psychanalyse interrupted its publication as soon as the armistice of 1940. Some people, e.g. Rudolf Loewenstein or Princess Marie Bonaparte, emigrated, others fought, e.g. Sacha Nacht or Paul Schiff. Daniel Lagache went on with his researches within the works of the University of Strasburg, which had sought shelter in Clermont-Ferrand. René Laforgue cooperated with the German occupant; after the Liberation of France in 1944 he was discarded from a group in which, a few years before, he may have entertained the hope of playing an outstanding part. Quite a few of those he analyzed remained faithful to him--which will have an important bearing on the evolution of the psychoanalytic movement in France after 1945. In 1945, indeed, the new generation emerging from the last convulsions of the war, will gather around the most influential potential leaders: Sacha Nacht and Jacques Lacan. Only after the latency of those silent years, only after those years of violent struggles and cowardice, will the psychoanalytic elaborations appear, and also the institutional feuds to which they gave vent--in a conflictual climate amounting to the schism of 1953.
在德国占领的四年间,法国在理论和临床领域都陷入了深度的精神分析沉默。1940年停战协定一签订,精神分析研究所就关闭了大门,《法国精神分析评论》也中断了出版。一些人,比如鲁道夫·洛温斯坦或玛丽·波拿巴公主,选择了移民;另一些人则进行了抗争,比如萨沙·纳赫特或保罗·希夫。丹尼尔·拉加什在斯特拉斯堡大学的工作中继续他的研究,该校已迁至克莱蒙费朗避难。勒内·拉福格与德国占领者合作;1944年法国解放后,他被一个几年前他或许还曾希望在其中发挥突出作用的团体抛弃。他分析过的不少人依然对他忠心耿耿——这对1945年后法国精神分析运动的发展有着重要影响。事实上,1945年,从战争的最后阵痛中涌现出的新一代,将会聚集在最具影响力的潜在领袖周围:萨沙·纳赫特和雅克·拉康。只有在那些沉默岁月的潜伏期过后,只有在经历了那些暴力斗争与怯懦行为的岁月之后,精神分析的阐述才会出现,以及随之而来的机构纷争——在一种冲突激烈的氛围中引发了1953年的分裂。