• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[无可用内容]

[Not Available].

作者信息

Schott H

机构信息

Medizinhistorisches Institut der Universität Bonn.

出版信息

Med Ges Gesch. 1993;12:9-20.

PMID:11640647
Abstract

Around 1800 the relationship between doctors and patients was determined by two opposing therapeutic principles, both of which were able to look back on a long tradition. On the one hand, the Enlightenment period lent prominence to the principle of correction, as can be traced paradigmatically in the field of orthopaedics. In this case medical treatment was closely linked to the conception of education. This approach emerged around 1800, particularly in the form of Brownianismus - in the field of psychiatry among others. At the same time the therapeutic principle of sympathy, which has its roots in magic healing, gained fresh impetus in the "electric age" of the Enlightenment, particularly through mesmerism (animal magnetism). Here it is a question of the hidden interdependence in nature, which gained considerable importance especially in the field of psychology on the early nineteenth century (in the context of the so-called Romantic Medicine). It is this area of tension, the combination of external correction and internal sympathy, which makes the period between Enlightenment and Romantic such a fascinating subject in the history of medicine.

摘要

大约在1800年,医生与患者之间的关系由两种相互对立的治疗原则决定,这两种原则都有着悠久的传统。一方面,启蒙运动时期突出了矫正原则,这在矫形外科领域有典型体现。在这种情况下,医疗与教育观念紧密相连。这种方法大约在1800年出现,尤其是以布朗医学说的形式——在精神病学等领域。与此同时,源于神奇疗法的同情治疗原则在启蒙运动的“电气时代”获得了新的动力,特别是通过催眠术(动物磁性说)。这里涉及的是自然界中隐藏的相互依存关系,这在19世纪早期尤其在心理学领域(在所谓的浪漫主义医学背景下)变得相当重要。正是这种紧张关系领域,即外部矫正与内部同情的结合,使得启蒙运动和浪漫主义时期之间成为医学史上一个如此引人入胜的主题。

相似文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Med Ges Gesch. 1993;12:9-20.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
4
[Subject and object of psychiatric research. On the history of concepts of a controversy].[精神病学研究的主体与客体。论争议概念的历史]
Nervenarzt. 1995 Jul;66(7):494-504.
5
[The history of the "patient": hazard, means, or object of the history of medicine?].["“患者”的历史:医学史的风险、手段还是对象?"]
Gesnerus. 2003;60(3-4):260-71.
6
[Medicine: art or science?].[医学:艺术还是科学?]
Med Ges Gesch. 2000;19:9-32.
7
[Natural philosophy in medieval medicine].[中世纪医学中的自然哲学]
Acta Hist Leopoldina. 2007(48):63-78.
8
[Does medicine limit enlightenment?].[医学是否限制启迪?]
Z Klin Psychol Psychother. 1977;25(1):5-20.
9
[The original paradigm of dependence - historical and cultural aspects].[依赖的原始范式——历史与文化方面]
Psychiatr Prax. 2004 Mar;31(2):78-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-814800.
10
[Mexican medicine in the romantic period. I. The ideas of Mexican medicine in the romantic period].
Gac Med Mex. 1969 Nov;99(11):1010-5.