Waife S O, Gruber C M, Rodda B E, Nash J F
Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1975 Jul;12(1-2):301-4.
Discrepancies exist between reports arising from single-dose and multiple-dose studies intended to compare the efficacy of oral analgesics. D Differences in the pharmacokinetic characteristics of these drugs account for much of the discord. Codeine and fenoprofen rapidly achieve their ultimate plasma equilibrium levels (on a q. 6h. schedule), whereas, propoxyphene requires a longer period, doubtless due to its longer half-life and proportionately smaller maintenance dose. If the drugs are not to be compared during the steady state, then administration of appropriate loading doses permits satisfactory single dose comparisons at steady-state concentrations.
旨在比较口服镇痛药疗效的单剂量研究和多剂量研究所得出的报告之间存在差异。这些药物药代动力学特征的差异在很大程度上导致了这种不一致。可待因和芬洛芬(按每6小时一次的给药方案)能迅速达到其最终血浆平衡水平,而丙氧芬则需要更长时间,这无疑是由于其半衰期更长且维持剂量相对较小。如果不在稳态期间比较这些药物,那么给予适当的负荷剂量可在稳态浓度下进行令人满意的单剂量比较。