Suppr超能文献

镇痛药单剂量测试的问题与解决方案:丙氧芬、可待因与苯氧布洛芬的比较

Problems and solutions to single-dose testing of analgesics: comparison of propoxyphene, codeine, and fenoprofen.

作者信息

Waife S O, Gruber C M, Rodda B E, Nash J F

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1975 Jul;12(1-2):301-4.

PMID:1165140
Abstract

Discrepancies exist between reports arising from single-dose and multiple-dose studies intended to compare the efficacy of oral analgesics. D Differences in the pharmacokinetic characteristics of these drugs account for much of the discord. Codeine and fenoprofen rapidly achieve their ultimate plasma equilibrium levels (on a q. 6h. schedule), whereas, propoxyphene requires a longer period, doubtless due to its longer half-life and proportionately smaller maintenance dose. If the drugs are not to be compared during the steady state, then administration of appropriate loading doses permits satisfactory single dose comparisons at steady-state concentrations.

摘要

旨在比较口服镇痛药疗效的单剂量研究和多剂量研究所得出的报告之间存在差异。这些药物药代动力学特征的差异在很大程度上导致了这种不一致。可待因和芬洛芬(按每6小时一次的给药方案)能迅速达到其最终血浆平衡水平,而丙氧芬则需要更长时间,这无疑是由于其半衰期更长且维持剂量相对较小。如果不在稳态期间比较这些药物,那么给予适当的负荷剂量可在稳态浓度下进行令人满意的单剂量比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验