Wertheimer Alan
Philos Public Aff. 1992 Summer;21(3):211-39.
In this article I will consider two related questions about surrogacy and exploitation: (1) Is surrogacy exploitative? (2) If surrogacy is exploitative, what is the moral force of this exploitation? Briefly stated, I shall argue that whether surrogacy is exploitative depends on whether exploitation must be harmful to the exploited party or whether (as I think) there can be mutually advantageous exploitation. It also depends on some facts about surrogacy about which we have little reliable evidence and on our philosophical view on what counts as a harm to the surrogate. Our answer to the second question will turn in part on the account of exploitation we invoke in answering the first question and in part on the way in which we resolve some other questions about the justification of state interference. I shall suggest, however, that if surrogacy is a form of voluntary and mutually advantageous exploitation, then there is a strong presumption that surrogacy contracts should be permitted and even enforceable, although that presumption may be overridden on other grounds.
在本文中,我将探讨关于代孕与剥削的两个相关问题:(1)代孕具有剥削性吗?(2)如果代孕具有剥削性,这种剥削的道德影响力是什么?简而言之,我将论证代孕是否具有剥削性取决于剥削是否必然对被剥削方有害,或者(如我所想)是否存在互利的剥削。这也取决于一些关于代孕的事实,而我们几乎没有可靠的证据,还取决于我们对于什么算作对代孕者的伤害的哲学观点。我们对第二个问题的回答部分将取决于我们在回答第一个问题时所援引的剥削解释,部分将取决于我们解决其他一些关于国家干预正当性问题的方式。然而,我将表明,如果代孕是一种自愿且互利的剥削形式,那么就有一个强烈的推定,即代孕合同应该被允许甚至具有可执行性,尽管这个推定可能基于其他理由而被推翻。