Norup Michael
Bioethics. 1997 Oct;11(5):439-49. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00083.
This article reports the results of a survey, by mailed questionnaire, of the attitudes among a sample of the Danish population towards abortion for social and genetic reasons. Of 1080 questionnaires sent to a random sample of persons between 18 and 45 years, 731 (68%) were completed and returned. A great majority of the respondents were liberal towards early abortion both for social reasons and in case of minor disease. In contrast, there was controversy about late abortions for social reasons and in the case of Down syndrome. Further there was strong reluctance to accept late abortion in case of minor disease. An analysis of the response patterns showed that most of the respondents had gradualist views on abortion, i.e. they would allow all early abortions, but only abortions for some reasons later in pregnancy. It was also found that the number who would find an early abortion acceptable in general was much higher than the number who would accept it in their own case. These findings suggest that a great part of the resistance towards abortion does not rest on a concern for the rights and interests for the fetus. Instead it may be explained on a view according to which fetal life is ascribed intrinsic moral value.
本文报告了一项通过邮寄问卷对丹麦部分人群关于出于社会和遗传原因堕胎的态度进行的调查结果。在向18至45岁的随机抽样人群发送的1080份问卷中,731份(68%)被填写并返回。绝大多数受访者对于因社会原因以及患有轻微疾病时的早期堕胎持宽容态度。相比之下,对于因社会原因以及唐氏综合征情况下的晚期堕胎存在争议。此外,对于患有轻微疾病时接受晚期堕胎存在强烈的抵触情绪。对回答模式的分析表明,大多数受访者对堕胎持渐进主义观点,即他们会允许所有早期堕胎,但仅在怀孕后期允许出于某些原因的堕胎。还发现,总体上认为早期堕胎可接受的人数远高于在自身情况下会接受早期堕胎的人数。这些发现表明,对堕胎的很大一部分抵制并非基于对胎儿权益的关注。相反,这可能可以用一种认为胎儿生命具有内在道德价值的观点来解释。