人类和其他动物的权利。
The rights of humans and other animals.
作者信息
Regan Tom
出版信息
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(2):103-11. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_2.
PMID:11655125
Abstract
Human moral rights place justified limits on what people are free to do to one another. Animals also have moral rights, and arguments to support the use of animals in scientific research based on the benefits allegedly derived from animal model research are thus invalid. Animals do not belong in laboratories because placing them there, in the hope of benefits for others, violates their rights.
摘要
人类道德权利对人们彼此之间可以自由行事的行为设定了合理限制。动物也拥有道德权利，因此，基于所谓动物模型研究带来的益处而支持在科学研究中使用动物的观点是无效的。动物不应被置于实验室，因为将它们置于实验室，寄希望于为他人带来益处，这侵犯了它们的权利。
相似文献
1
The rights of humans and other animals.
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(2):103-11. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_2.
2
Ethical considerations in painful animal research.
Adv Pain Res Ther. 1985;9:685-94.
3
Opposing views on animal experimentation: do animals have rights?
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(2):113-21. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_3.
4
Moral community and animal research in medicine.
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(2):123-36. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_4.
5
Utilitarian killing, replacement, and rights.
J Agric Ethics. 1990;3(2):147-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02014611.
6
Animal rights, human rights.
First Things. 1992 Feb;20:23-30.
7
Moral standing, the value of lives, and speciesism.
Between Species. 1988 Summer;4(3):191-201. doi: 10.15368/bts.1988v4n3.8.
8
A Christian perspective on the use of animals for medical research and transplantation.
Ethics Med. 1995;11(3):56-67.
9
The responsible use of animals in biomedical research.
Between Species. 1989 Summer;5(3):123-31. doi: 10.15368/bts.1989v5n3.1.
10
The failure of theories of personhood.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Dec;9(4):309-24. doi: 10.1353/ken.1999.0023.
Zotero 插件