Frey R G
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(2):123-36. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_4.
The invocation of moral rights in moral/social debate today is a recipe for deadlock in our consideration of substantive issues. How we treat animals and humans in part should derive from the value of their lives, which is a function of the quality of their lives, which in turn is a function of the richness of their lives. Consistency in argument requires that humans with a low quality of life should be chosen as experimental subjects over animals with a higher quality of life.
在当今道德/社会辩论中援引道德权利，会导致我们在考虑实质性问题时陷入僵局。我们对待动物和人类的方式部分应源于其生命的价值，而生命价值是其生活质量的函数，生活质量又是其生活丰富程度的函数。论证的一致性要求，应选择生活质量低的人类而非生活质量高的动物作为实验对象。
