Steneck Nicholas H
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(2):173-84. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_8.
During the 1980s, federal regulations transferred significant portions of the responsibility for monitoring the care and use of research animals from animal care programs to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs). After a brief review of the history of the regulation of the use of animals in research preceding and during the 4 decades following World War II, this article raises 4 problems associated with the role IACUCs currently play in monitoring the use of animals in research: (a) lack of expertise, (b) diverted resources, (c) conflict of interest, and (d) restrictions of academic freedom. It is concluded that the care and treatment of animals used in research would be served better and organized more rationally if the day-to-day responsibilities for approving projects and caring for animals were separated more clearly from broader, oversight functions, with the former being assigned to animal care programs and the latter to IACUCs.
在20世纪80年代,联邦法规将监测实验动物护理和使用情况的大部分责任从动物护理项目转移到了机构动物护理和使用委员会(IACUC)。在简要回顾第二次世界大战之前及之后40年期间实验动物使用监管的历史后,本文提出了与IACUC目前在监测实验动物使用方面所起作用相关的4个问题:(a)缺乏专业知识,(b)资源转移,(c)利益冲突,以及(d)学术自由受限。得出的结论是,如果将批准项目和照顾动物的日常责任与更广泛的监督职能更明确地分开,前者分配给动物护理项目,后者分配给IACUC,那么用于研究的动物的护理和待遇将会得到更好的保障,组织也会更加合理。