Suppr超能文献

联合卫理公会对待临终决策的方式:故意含糊还是意图含糊。

A United Methodist approach to end-of-life decisions: intentional ambiguity or ambiguous intentions.

作者信息

Thobaben James R

出版信息

Christ Bioeth. 1997 Dec;3(3):222-48. doi: 10.1093/cb/3.3.222.

Abstract

The position of the United Methodist Church on end-of-life decisions is best described as intentional ambiguity or ambiguous intentions or both. The paper analyzes the official position of the denomination and then considers the actions of a U.M.C. bishop who served as a foreman for a trial of Dr. Jack Kevorkian. In an effort to find some common ground within an increasingly divided denomination, the work concludes with a consideration of the work of John Wesley and his approach to human death.

摘要

联合卫理公会对于临终决策的立场,最好描述为有意的含糊不清、意图模糊或者两者皆有。本文分析了该教派的官方立场,然后考量了一位担任杰克·凯沃尔基安医生审判陪审团主席的联合卫理公会主教的行为。为了在日益分裂的教派中找到一些共同点,本文最后探讨了约翰·卫斯理的著作及其对待人类死亡的方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验