• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国疼痛研究协会(DGSS)伦理宪章]

[Ethic charter of the German Society for the Study of Pain (DGSS)].

作者信息

Reiter-Theil S, Graf-Baumann T, Kutzer K, Müller-Busch H C, Stutzki R, Traue H C, Willweber-Strumpf A, Zimmermann M, Zenz M

机构信息

Institut für Angewandte Ethik und Medizinethik, Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2008 Apr;22(2):191-206. doi: 10.1007/s00482-008-0648-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00482-008-0648-6
PMID:18351397
Abstract

The German Society for the Study of Pain has formed an interdisciplinary committee to answer urgent ethical questions on the diagnosis and treatment of pain and to give an ethical orientation on the care of pain and palliative patients. The treatment of pain is a fundamental objective of medicine. Competent and adequate relief of pain in all stages of life is a basic characteristic of a humane medicine oriented to the quality and meaning of life for people. However, there are substantial deficits in all areas, especially in the knowledge of physicians and patients, in training and further education, diagnosis and therapy. Freedom from pain is a substantial element of quality of life. A central duty of all physicians is an adequate diagnosis and treatment of acute pain and thereby the prophylaxis of chronic pain. If pain persists over a longer period of time, it loses the warning function and becomes taken for granted. Alterations, disabilities and limitations of the physical, psychic and social levels are the consequences. For these patients an interdisciplinary approach is necessary by which various medical disciplines, psychologists and physiotherapists are involved and all collaborate on the diagnosis and therapy of pain. All patients have the right to sufficient and individually tailored treatment of pain. Special attention must be paid to vulnerable patient groups, such as newborns, children and adolescents, as well as aged and mentally retarded patients. For cancer patients pain relief of their tumor pain is totally in the forefront. Indications of "unbearable pain" must not lead to resignation or even be seen as an argument for legalization of "death on request". The nursing of terminally ill patients necessitates a special measure not only of clinical, but also ethical competence, communication and multiprofessional collaboration. The modern options for palliative care are real alternatives to demands for legalization of "death on request". Physician-assisted suicide does not belong to the scope of functions of palliative medicine. The basic constitutional law makes an appropriate treatment of pain obligatory. Neglect of pain treatment fulfils the elements of criminal bodily harm. As a consequence, there is a legal right to a comprehensive pain diagnosis and a pain treatment corresponding to the appropriate standard. The state is obliged to provide the legal, social and financial prerequisites for an adequate treatment of pain. Continuous efforts in research are necessary to fill the existing gaps in our knowledge. The transfer between basic research and clinical application of pain therapy must be urgently improved. Of central importance for the German Pain Society are therefore: Improvement of training and further education in pain therapy. Chronic pain must be accepted and coded as an autonomous sickness. Graded structures for care of pain patients must be realized. Interdisciplinary structures of care must be made available to patients with chronic pain. Palliative medical care is a basic right of all terminally ill patients. Politics and health care providers must establish prerequisites for adequate pain diagnosis, pain therapy and palliative medicine.

摘要

德国疼痛研究协会成立了一个跨学科委员会,以回答有关疼痛诊断和治疗的紧迫伦理问题,并为疼痛护理和姑息治疗患者提供伦理指导。疼痛治疗是医学的一项基本目标。在生命的各个阶段,有效且充分地缓解疼痛是以人的生活质量和意义为导向的人道医学的一个基本特征。然而,在各个领域都存在重大不足,尤其是在医生和患者的知识、培训与继续教育、诊断和治疗方面。无痛是生活质量的一个重要因素。所有医生的一项核心职责是对急性疼痛进行充分诊断和治疗,从而预防慢性疼痛。如果疼痛持续较长时间,它就会失去警示功能并变得习以为常。其后果是身体、心理和社会层面出现改变、残疾和限制。对于这些患者,需要采取跨学科方法,让各个医学学科、心理学家和物理治疗师参与进来,共同对疼痛进行诊断和治疗。所有患者都有权获得充分且个性化的疼痛治疗。必须特别关注弱势群体,如新生儿、儿童和青少年,以及老年和智障患者。对于癌症患者,缓解其肿瘤疼痛是重中之重。“无法忍受的疼痛”这一说法绝不能导致放弃治疗,甚至不能被视为支持“安乐死合法化”的理由。对临终患者的护理不仅需要特殊的临床能力,还需要伦理能力、沟通能力和多专业协作。现代姑息治疗方案是“安乐死合法化”诉求的真正替代方案。医生协助自杀不属于姑息医学的职能范围。基本宪法规定必须对疼痛进行适当治疗。忽视疼痛治疗构成刑事身体伤害的要件。因此,患者有获得全面疼痛诊断和符合适当标准的疼痛治疗的合法权利。国家有义务提供充分治疗疼痛所需的法律、社会和财政前提条件。必须持续努力开展研究,以填补我们现有知识的空白。必须紧急改善疼痛治疗基础研究与临床应用之间的转化。因此,对德国疼痛协会而言至关重要的是:改进疼痛治疗方面的培训与继续教育。慢性疼痛必须被视为一种独立疾病并进行编码。必须建立针对疼痛患者护理的分级体系。必须为慢性疼痛患者提供跨学科护理结构。姑息医疗护理是所有临终患者的一项基本权利。政治和医疗服务提供者必须为充分的疼痛诊断、疼痛治疗和姑息医学创造前提条件。

相似文献

1
[Ethic charter of the German Society for the Study of Pain (DGSS)].[德国疼痛研究协会(DGSS)伦理宪章]
Schmerz. 2008 Apr;22(2):191-206. doi: 10.1007/s00482-008-0648-6.
2
[Key ethic discussions in hospice/palliative care].[临终关怀/姑息治疗中的关键伦理讨论]
Acta Med Croatica. 2008 Dec;62(5):447-54.
3
[Ethical aspects of palliative medicine].[姑息医学的伦理问题]
Internist (Berl). 2016 Oct;57(10):946-952. doi: 10.1007/s00108-016-0129-4.
4
[Limits of pain treatment: medical and judicial aspects].[疼痛治疗的局限:医学与司法层面]
Schmerz. 2011 Aug;25(4):377-80, 382-92. doi: 10.1007/s00482-011-1073-9.
5
Attitudes on euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide and terminal sedation--a survey of the members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine.关于安乐死、医生协助自杀和临终镇静的态度——对德国姑息医学协会成员的一项调查
Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7(3):333-9. doi: 10.1007/s11019-004-9349-9.
6
[Improvement of palliative outpatient treatment of terminally ill cancer patients - SUPPORT as example - The ethically preferable alternative to euthanasia].[晚期癌症患者姑息门诊治疗的改善——以SUPPORT为例——安乐死在伦理上更可取的替代方案]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2001 Sep;36(9):530-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17256.
7
Euthanasia: killing as due care?安乐死:作为应有的关怀而实施的杀戮?
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2003;153(17-18):387-91. doi: 10.1007/s10354-003-0020-5.
8
Seven legal barriers to end-of-life care: myths, realities, and grains of truth.临终关怀的七个法律障碍:误区、现实与真相
JAMA. 2000 Nov 15;284(19):2495-501. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.19.2495.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
The Supreme Court addresses physician-assisted suicide. Can its rulings improve palliative care?最高法院对医生协助自杀问题进行了裁决。其裁决能否改善姑息治疗?
Arch Fam Med. 1999 May-Jun;8(3):200-5. doi: 10.1001/archfami.8.3.200.

引用本文的文献

1
[Postoperative pain assessment in special patient groups: part II. Children with cognitive impairment].
Schmerz. 2011 Jun;25(3):256-65. doi: 10.1007/s00482-011-1061-0.
2
[The right to pain treatment--obligatory continuing education].
Schmerz. 2011 Feb;25(1):7-9. doi: 10.1007/s00482-011-1024-5.
3
[Pain and fear of movement in the elderly : the need for an interdisciplinary approach].
Schmerz. 2010 Dec;24(6):561-8. doi: 10.1007/s00482-010-0976-1.
4
[To give or not to give, that is not the question here! Longterm administration of opioids for non-tumor pain (LONTS)].给予还是不给予,这不是这里的问题!阿片类药物用于非肿瘤疼痛的长期给药(LONTS)

本文引用的文献

1
[The right to pain relief.].
Schmerz. 1991 Jun;5(2):53-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02529467.
2
Current controversies regarding pain assessment in neonates.当前关于新生儿疼痛评估的争议。
Semin Perinatol. 2007 Oct;31(5):283-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.07.003.
3
German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups.德国慢性下腰痛针灸试验(GERAC):一项三臂随机、多中心、双盲、平行组试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Sep 24;167(17):1892-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.17.1892.
Schmerz. 2009 Oct;23(5):437-9. doi: 10.1007/s00482-009-0840-3.
5
[Risk minimization in pain therapy: important target but how can it be reached?].[疼痛治疗中的风险最小化:重要目标但如何实现?]
Schmerz. 2008 Oct;22(5):519-22. doi: 10.1007/s00482-008-0707-z.
6
[Ethics for beginners].《伦理学入门》
Schmerz. 2008 Apr;22(2):127-8. doi: 10.1007/s00482-008-0651-y.
4
Physicians' views on resource availability and equity in four European health care systems.欧洲四个医疗保健系统中医师对资源可用性和公平性的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug 31;7:137. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-137.
5
Spirituality, religion, and pain.精神性、宗教与疼痛。
Can J Nurs Res. 2007 Jun;39(2):66-86.
6
Relevance of religion and spirituality in German patients with chronic diseases.宗教与精神性在德国慢性病患者中的相关性。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2007;37(1):39-57. doi: 10.2190/60W7-1661-2623-6042.
7
Spirituality, religion and health: evidence and research directions.精神性、宗教与健康:证据及研究方向。
Med J Aust. 2007 May 21;186(S10):S47-50. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01040.x.
8
Undergraduate training in palliative medicine in Germany: what effect does a curriculum without compulsory palliative care have on medical students' knowledge, skills and attitudes?德国本科阶段的姑息医学培训:一门无强制性姑息治疗内容的课程对医学生的知识、技能和态度会产生怎样的影响?
Palliat Med. 2007 Mar;21(2):155-6. doi: 10.1177/0269216306075543.
9
Measurement in pain therapy: is pain relief really the endpoint?
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 1998 Oct;11(5):533-7. doi: 10.1097/00001503-199810000-00015.
10
[Assessment of pain in advanced dementia. Construct validity of the German PAINAD].
Schmerz. 2006 Nov;20(6):519-26. doi: 10.1007/s00482-006-0490-7.