Brody Janet L, Gluck John P, Aragon Alfredo S
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(4):285-98. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0704_1.
Sixty-five undergraduates participating in a wide range of psychological research experiments were interviewed in depth about their research experiences and their views on the process of informed consent. Overall, 32% of research experiences were characterized positively and 41% were characterized negatively. One major theme of the negative experiences was that experiments were perceived as too invasive, suggesting incomplete explication of negative aspects of research during the informed consent process. Informed consent experiences were viewed positively 80% of the time. However, most of the participants had a limited view of the purpose of informed consent: less than 20% viewed the process as a decision point. Results suggest a number of common pitfalls to standard informed consent practices that have not generally been recognized. Results are discussed in terms of both ethical and methodological implications. Suggestions for improving the informed consent process are also provided.
对65名参与各种心理学研究实验的本科生就他们的研究经历以及对知情同意过程的看法进行了深入访谈。总体而言,32%的研究经历被描述为积极的,41%被描述为消极的。消极经历的一个主要主题是,实验被认为过于侵入性,这表明在知情同意过程中对研究负面方面的解释不完整。80%的情况下,知情同意经历被视为积极的。然而,大多数参与者对知情同意目的的理解有限:不到20%的人将该过程视为一个决策点。结果表明了一些标准知情同意做法中常见但通常未被认识到的陷阱。从伦理和方法学意义两方面对结果进行了讨论。还提供了改进知情同意过程的建议。