Suppr超能文献

参与者对心理学研究过程的理解:事后解说

Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: debriefing.

作者信息

Brody Janet L, Gluck John P, Aragon Alfredo S

出版信息

Ethics Behav. 2000;10(1):13-25. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1001_2.

Abstract

In a broad-based study of experiences in psychological research, 65 undergraduates participating in a wide range of psychological experiments were interviewed in depth. Overall findings demonstrated that participants hold varying views, with only 32% of participants characterizing their experiences as completely positive. Participants' descriptions of their debriefing experiences suggest substantial variability in the content, format, and general quality of debriefing practices. Just over 40% of the debriefing experiences were viewed favorably. Positive debriefing experiences were described as including a thorough explanation of the study and detailed information concerning the broader relevance of the experiment to the field of psychology. The most common complaint, characterizing 28.8% of the responses, was that the debriefing was unclear and that insufficient information was provided. Participants' views of psychological research and the discipline of psychology were also elicited. Results are discussed in terms of ethical and methodological implications.

摘要

在一项关于心理研究经历的广泛研究中,对65名参与各种心理实验的本科生进行了深入访谈。总体研究结果表明,参与者持有不同的观点,只有32%的参与者将他们的经历描述为完全积极的。参与者对他们的汇报经历的描述表明,汇报实践在内容、形式和总体质量上存在很大差异。略多于40%的汇报经历得到了积极评价。积极的汇报经历被描述为包括对研究的全面解释以及关于该实验与心理学领域更广泛相关性的详细信息。最常见的抱怨(占28.8%的回答)是汇报不清楚且提供的信息不足。还了解了参与者对心理研究和心理学学科的看法。从伦理和方法学意义的角度对结果进行了讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验