Cummings Jorden A, Zagrodney Jessica M, Day T Eugene
Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Office of Safety and Medical Operations, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 May 20;10(5):e0125208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125208. eCollection 2015.
Research outlets are increasingly adopting open data policies as a requisite for publication, including studies with human subjects data. We investigated whether open data policies influence participants' rate of consent by randomly assigning participants to view consent forms with and without discussion of open data policies. No participants declined to participate, regardless of condition, nor did rates of drop-out vs. completion vary between conditions. Furthermore, no significant change in potential consent rates was reported when participants were openly asked about the influence of open data policies on their likelihood of consent. However, follow-up analyses indicated possible poor attention to consent forms, consistent with previous research. Moreover, thematic analysis of participants' considerations of open data policy indicated multiple considerations such as concerns regarding confidentiality, anonymity, data security, and study sensitivity. The impact of open data policies on participation raises complex issues at the intersection of ethics and scientific innovation. We conclude by encouraging researchers to consider participants as stakeholders in open data policy and by providing recommendations for open data policies in human subjects research.
研究机构越来越多地采用开放数据政策作为发表的必要条件,包括涉及人类受试者数据的研究。我们通过随机分配参与者查看包含和不包含开放数据政策讨论的同意书,来调查开放数据政策是否会影响参与者的同意率。无论处于何种情况,均没有参与者拒绝参与,不同情况之间的退出率与完成率也没有差异。此外,当直接询问参与者开放数据政策对其同意可能性的影响时,潜在同意率没有显著变化。然而,后续分析表明参与者可能对同意书关注不足,这与先前的研究一致。此外,对参与者对开放数据政策考虑因素的主题分析表明了多种考虑因素,如对保密性、匿名性、数据安全性和研究敏感性的担忧。开放数据政策对参与的影响在伦理与科学创新的交叉点上引发了复杂问题。我们在结论中鼓励研究人员将参与者视为开放数据政策的利益相关者,并为人类受试者研究中的开放数据政策提供建议。