• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让用户参与设计一项干预措施以促进乳腺癌早期就诊的随机对照试验:定性研究。

Involving users in the design of a randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote early presentation in breast cancer: qualitative study.

机构信息

King's College London Promoting Early Presentation Group, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Dec 22;10:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-110.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-10-110
PMID:21176229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3023725/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to explore women's views of the design of a large pragmatic cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial of the policy of offering a health professional-delivered intervention to promote early presentation with breast symptoms in older women and thereby improve survival, with a view to informing protocol development. The trial will recruit over 100,000 healthy women aged 67+, and outcome data will be collected on those who develop breast cancer. The scale of the trial and the need for long-term follow-up presented a number of design challenges in relation to obtaining consent, ascertaining and contacting participants who developed breast cancer, and collecting outcome data.

METHODS

Qualitative study involving 69 women participating in 7 focus groups and 17 in-depth interviews. 15 women had a previous diagnosis of breast cancer and 54 did not.

RESULTS

The women held strong views and had a good understanding of the rationale of the design of clinical trials. The women recognised that in a very large trial with long-term follow-up it was necessary to incorporate design features to make the trial feasible and efficient. Most strikingly, they supported the idea of opt-out consent and identifying women with breast cancer using routine datasets.

CONCLUSIONS

This model of user involvement engaged women well with the design challenges of the trial and led to improvements to the protocol. The study strengthens the case for user involvement, in particular through focus groups and in-depth interviews, in the design of trials.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨女性对一项大型实用成本效益随机对照试验设计的看法,该试验旨在针对老年女性乳房症状提出一项卫生专业人员提供的干预措施的政策,以提高早期就诊率,从而改善生存状况,为制定方案提供依据。该试验将招募超过 100,000 名 67 岁以上的健康女性,对出现乳腺癌的女性将收集其结局数据。试验规模庞大,需要长期随访,这给同意书的获取、确定和联系出现乳腺癌的参与者以及收集结局数据带来了一些设计挑战。

方法

采用定性研究方法,纳入 69 名参加 7 次焦点小组和 17 次深入访谈的女性。15 名女性曾被诊断患有乳腺癌,54 名女性未被诊断。

结果

女性对临床试验设计的原理持有强烈的观点和良好的理解。女性认识到,在一项具有长期随访的大型试验中,必须采用设计特征使试验可行且高效。最引人注目的是,她们支持默认同意的想法,并使用常规数据集来确定患有乳腺癌的女性。

结论

这种用户参与模式使女性很好地参与了试验的设计挑战,并对方案进行了改进。该研究支持用户参与,特别是通过焦点小组和深入访谈,参与试验设计。

相似文献

1
Involving users in the design of a randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote early presentation in breast cancer: qualitative study.让用户参与设计一项干预措施以促进乳腺癌早期就诊的随机对照试验:定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Dec 22;10:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-110.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.流行病学方法与应用概述:观察性研究设计的优势与局限性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.526838.
4
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
5
Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.使用包含过度检测信息的决策辅助工具来支持有关乳腺癌筛查的知情选择:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1642-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60123-4. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
6
Women's views on chemoprevention of breast cancer: qualitative study.女性对乳腺癌化学预防的看法:定性研究
Can Fam Physician. 2006 May;52(5):624-5.
7
An interactive website to aid young women's choice of contraception: feasibility and efficacy RCT.一个互动网站,帮助年轻女性选择避孕方法:可行性和有效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(56):1-44. doi: 10.3310/hta24560.
8
Breast cancer risk assessment in a mammography screening program and participation in the IBIS-II chemoprevention trial.在乳腺 X 光筛查计划中进行乳腺癌风险评估以及参与 IBIS-II 化学预防试验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 May;121(1):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0845-8. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
9
Women's Experiences With Mammography Screening Through 6 Years of Participation--A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.女性参与六年乳腺钼靶筛查的经历——一项纵向定性研究
Health Care Women Int. 2015;36(5):558-77. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2014.989438. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
10
[Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].[定制乳房筛查试验(TBST)]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5):317-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Participation: Evaluating the Role of Patients in Designing Oncology Clinical Trials.超越参与:评估患者在肿瘤临床试验设计中的作用。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 8;30(9):8310-8327. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090603.
2
Patient and public involvement in cancer research: A scoping review.患者和公众参与癌症研究:范围综述。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15530-15543. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6200. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
3
Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis.运用定性方法进行试验研究和可行性研究,为全规模随机试验中的招募和保留过程提供信息:定性证据综合。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 18;12(4):e055521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055521.
4
Changing Author Guidelines to Include Patient and Public Involvement.修改作者指南以纳入患者和公众参与。
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2019 Jun 1;12(2):1-2. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model.一种联合制作的方法,使服务使用者参与研究:SUCCESS 模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Feb 15;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0671-6.
6
Applying a community-based participatory research framework to patient and family engagement in the development of patient-centered outcomes research and practice.将基于社区的参与式研究框架应用于患者和家属参与以患者为中心的结局研究和实践的发展。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Sep 8;8(5):683-691. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx026.
7
Interventions for raising breast cancer awareness in women.提高女性乳腺癌意识的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 10;2(2):CD011396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011396.pub2.
8
Active patient participation in the development of an online intervention.患者积极参与在线干预措施的制定。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Nov 6;3(4):e59. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3695.
9
Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trial development: a systematic cohort investigation.患者及公众参与临床试验早期阶段:一项系统性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e005234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005234.
10
Consumer involvement in cancer research: example from a Cancer Network.消费者参与癌症研究:来自一个癌症网络的实例。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1530-42. doi: 10.1111/hex.12143. Epub 2013 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote early presentation of breast cancer in older women: effect on breast cancer awareness.一项旨在促进老年女性早期乳腺癌就诊的干预措施的随机对照试验:对乳腺癌认知的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S40-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605389.
2
Promoting early presentation of breast cancer by older women: a preliminary evaluation of a one-to-one health professional-delivered intervention.促进老年女性早期乳腺癌就诊:一对一健康专业人员干预的初步评估。
J Psychosom Res. 2009 Nov;67(5):377-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
3
Breast cancer incidence, stage, treatment and survival in ethnic groups in South East England.英格兰东南部不同种族群体的乳腺癌发病率、分期、治疗及生存率
Br J Cancer. 2009 Feb 10;100(3):545-50. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604852. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
4
Promoting early presentation of breast cancer: development of a psycho-educational intervention.促进乳腺癌的早期发现:一种心理教育干预措施的开发
Chronic Illn. 2008 Mar;4(1):13-27. doi: 10.1177/1742395307084404.
5
Involving communities in the design of clinical trial protocols: the BAN Study in Lilongwe, Malawi.让社区参与临床试验方案的设计:马拉维利隆圭的BAN研究
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Jan;28(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Aug 11.
6
National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry.英国公众对国家癌症登记处使用可识别医疗数据看法的全国性调查。
BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1068-72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38805.473738.7C. Epub 2006 Apr 28.
7
What patients want: consumer involvement in the design of a randomized controlled trial of routine oxygen supplementation after acute stroke.患者的需求:消费者参与急性中风后常规氧疗随机对照试验的设计
Stroke. 2006 Mar;37(3):865-71. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000204053.36966.80. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
8
Informed patient consent to participation in cluster randomized trials: an empirical exploration of trials in primary care.患者对参与整群随机试验的知情同意:对初级保健试验的实证探索
Clin Trials. 2005;2(2):91-8. doi: 10.1191/1740774505cn070oa.
9
Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies.招募患者参与医学研究:“选择加入”与“选择退出”策略的双盲随机试验。
BMJ. 2005 Oct 22;331(7522):940. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38583.625613.AE. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
10
Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.公众对随机对照试验中均衡性和随机化的理解。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(8):1-192, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9080.