Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物在癌症和慢性非癌性疼痛治疗中的应用——适应证与争议

Opioids in cancer and chronic non-cancer pain therapy-indications and controversies.

作者信息

Breivik H

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Oct;45(9):1059-66. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450902.x.

Abstract

Indications for strong opioids for cancer-related pain as well as for chronic non-cancer pain are that non-opioid drugs, and other less risky therapies, fail and that the pain is opioid-sensitive. The WHO analgesic ladder principle continues to serve as an excellent educational tool in the efforts by WHO in collaboration with the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WFSA) and The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) to increase knowledge of pharmacological pain therapy and increase availability of essential opioid analgesics world-wide. Opioids differ in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, and patients have different pharmacogenetics and pain mechanisms. Sequential trials of the increasing numbers of available opioid drugs are therefore appropriate when oral morphine fails. Controversies continue concerning diagnosis and handling of opioid-insensitive pain in cancer and chronic non-cancer pain, opioid-induced neurotoxicities, risks of tolerance, addiction, pseudo-addiction, and methods for improving effectiveness and decreasing adverse effects of long-term opioid therapy, treating breakthrough pain with immediate release oral and transmucosal opioids. Consensus guidelines have recently been developed in the Nordic countries concerning the ethical practice of palliative sedation when opioids and other pain-relieving therapies fail in patients soon to die. Guidelines for long-term treatment with strong opioids of chronic non-cancer-related pain are also being developed in the Nordic countries, where very diverging traditions for the usage of such therapy still exist.

摘要

用于癌症相关疼痛以及慢性非癌性疼痛的强效阿片类药物的适应症是,非阿片类药物和其他风险较低的治疗方法无效,且疼痛对阿片类药物敏感。世界卫生组织(WHO)与世界麻醉医师协会联合会(WFSA)和国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)合作,努力提高药理学疼痛治疗知识并在全球范围内增加基本阿片类镇痛药的可及性,WHO镇痛阶梯原则仍然是一个出色的教育工具。阿片类药物在药效学和药代动力学方面存在差异,患者的药物遗传学和疼痛机制也各不相同。因此,当口服吗啡无效时,对越来越多可用的阿片类药物进行序贯试验是合适的。关于癌症和慢性非癌性疼痛中阿片类药物不敏感疼痛的诊断和处理、阿片类药物引起的神经毒性、耐受性、成瘾、假性成瘾的风险,以及改善长期阿片类药物治疗有效性和降低不良反应的方法、用即释口服和经粘膜阿片类药物治疗爆发性疼痛等问题,仍存在争议。北欧国家最近制定了关于在阿片类药物和其他止痛治疗对濒死患者无效时进行姑息性镇静的伦理实践的共识指南。北欧国家也正在制定关于慢性非癌性疼痛的强效阿片类药物长期治疗的指南,在这些国家,这种治疗方法的使用传统差异很大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验