将科学歪曲为垃圾：烟草行业与被动吸烟
Turning science into junk: the tobacco industry and passive smoking.
作者信息
Samet J M, Burke T A
机构信息
Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md 21205, USA.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1742-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1742.
Abstract
In this issue, Glantz and Ong offer a powerful analysis of the tobacco industry's attempt to discredit the scientific evidence on passive smoking, particularly the industry's use of the label "junk science." Environmental epidemiologic studies in other arenas have also been targets for the "junk science" label. Lessons for researchers involved in high-stakes issues in the public policy arena include a need for awareness of competing interests, for transparency concerning funding, and for adherence to rigorous quality assurance and peer review practices. The goal of "sound science" seems an admirable one; it should not, however, be used to dismiss available but uncertain evidence in order to delay action.
摘要
在本期中，格兰茨和翁对烟草业试图诋毁关于被动吸烟的科学证据进行了有力分析，尤其是该行业对“垃圾科学”这一标签的使用。其他领域的环境流行病学研究也成为了“垃圾科学”标签的目标。对于参与公共政策领域高风险问题研究的人员来说，教训包括需要意识到利益冲突、资金来源透明以及坚持严格的质量保证和同行评审做法。“可靠科学”的目标似乎令人钦佩；然而，它不应被用来忽视现有但不确定的证据以拖延行动。
相似文献
1
Turning science into junk: the tobacco industry and passive smoking.将科学歪曲为垃圾：烟草行业与被动吸烟
Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1742-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1742.
2
Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms.构建“可靠科学”与“良好流行病学”：烟草、律师与公关公司
Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1749-57. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1749.
3
Junking science to promote tobacco.摒弃科学以推广烟草。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1745-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1745.
4
Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.在一项由烟草行业资助的婴儿猝死综合征评估中，关于二手烟的结论突然改变。
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e356-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1922.
5
Identifying carcinogens: the tobacco industry and regulatory politics in the United States.识别致癌物：美国的烟草行业与监管政策
Int J Health Serv. 2006;36(4):747-66. doi: 10.2190/A4MN-6WG5-J7TA-KQ00.
6
Turning free speech into corporate speech: Philip Morris' efforts to influence U.S. and European journalists regarding the U.S. EPA report on secondhand smoke.将言论自由转变为企业言论：菲利普·莫里斯公司就美国环境保护局关于二手烟的报告对美国和欧洲记者施加影响的种种努力。
Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):568-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.014.
7
"Conclusions about exposure to ETS and health that will be unhelpful to us": how the tobacco industry attempted to delay and discredit the 1997 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council report on passive smoking.“关于接触环境烟草烟雾与健康的结论对我们毫无帮助”：烟草行业如何试图拖延并诋毁1997年澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会关于被动吸烟的报告。
Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii102-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii102.
8
How to identify science being bent: the tobacco industry's fight to deny second-hand smoking health hazards as an example.如何识别被歪曲的科学：以烟草业否认二手烟危害健康为例。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Oct;75(7):1230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.057. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
9
Science for hire: a tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke.受雇的科学：烟草行业影响公众对二手烟看法的策略。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Jun;5(3):303-14. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000094169.
10
Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research.行业资助研究与利益冲突：对烟草行业通过室内空气研究中心赞助的研究的分析。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Fall;21(3):515-42. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-3-515.
引用本文的文献
1
Evidence-Based Health Policies and Its Discontents - Comparative Global and Indian Perspectives with a Focus on the COVID-19 Pandemic.基于证据的卫生政策及其不满——以新冠疫情为重点的全球与印度比较视角
Indian J Community Med. 2021 Jul-Sep;46(3):363-366. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_622_21. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
2
Factors Associated with Tobacco Cessation in Primary Health Care.基层医疗保健中与戒烟相关的因素
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Feb 19;25(4):e551-e556. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722164. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Beyond nutrition and physical activity: food industry shaping of the very principles of scientific integrity.超越营养和体育活动：食品行业对科学诚信原则的影响。
Global Health. 2021 Apr 20;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00689-1.
4
Analysis of Alcohol Industry Submissions against Marketing Regulation.酒类行业针对营销监管提交意见的分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 24;12(1):e0170366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170366. eCollection 2017.
5
The Temporal Structure of Scientific Consensus Formation.科学共识形成的时间结构。
Am Sociol Rev. 2010 Dec 1;75(6):817-840. doi: 10.1177/0003122410388488.
6
Tobacco industry efforts to undermine policy-relevant research.烟草行业破坏与政策相关研究的行为。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jan;99(1):45-58. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.130740. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
7
Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement.旧方式，新手段：自《主协议和解》以来烟草行业对学术和私营部门科学家的资助
Tob Control. 2007 Jun;16(3):157-64. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.017186.
8
Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses.挑战关于被动吸烟的流行病学证据：烟草行业专家证人的策略。
Tob Control. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv68-76. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.014241.
9
Implementation failures in the use of two New Zealand laws to control the tobacco industry: 1989-2005.1989 - 2005年期间，新西兰两部用于管控烟草行业的法律在实施过程中遭遇的失败情况。
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2005 Dec 14;2:32. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-2-32.
10
"Sound science" and tobacco exposure.“可靠的科学”与烟草暴露
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):891. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.891.
本文引用的文献
1
Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms.构建“可靠科学”与“良好流行病学”：烟草、律师与公关公司
Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1749-57. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1749.
2
A solution to concerns over public access to scientific data.解决公众获取科学数据相关担忧的一个办法。
Science. 1999 Jul 23;285(5427):535-6. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5427.535.
3
Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency.接触环境烟草烟雾对健康的影响。加利福尼亚环境保护局。
Tob Control. 1997 Winter;6(4):346-53. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.4.346.
Zotero 插件