Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.
Global Health. 2021 Apr 20;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00689-1.
There is evidence that food industry actors try to shape science on nutrition and physical activity. But they are also involved in influencing the principles of scientific integrity. Our research objective was to study the extent of that involvement, with a case study of ILSI as a key actor in that space. We conducted a qualitative document analysis, triangulating data from an existing scoping review, publicly available information, internal industry documents, and existing freedom of information requests.
Food companies have joined forces through ILSI to shape the development of scientific integrity principles. These activities started in 2007, in direct response to the growing criticism of the food industry's funding of research. ILSI first built a niche literature on COI in food science and nutrition at the individual and study levels. Because the literature was scarce on that topic, these publications were used and cited in ILSI's and others' further work on COI, scientific integrity, and PPP, beyond the fields of nutrition and food science. In the past few years, ILSI started to shape the very principles of scientific integrity then and to propose that government agencies, professional associations, non-for-profits, and others, adopt these principles. In the process, ILSI built a reputation in the scientific integrity space. ILSI's work on scientific integrity ignores the risks of accepting corporate funding and fails to provide guidelines to protect from these risks.
The activities developed by ILSI on scientific integrity principles are part of a broader set of political practices of industry actors to influence public health policy, research, and practice. It is important to learn about and counter these practices as they risk shaping scientific standards to suit the industry's interests rather than public health ones.
有证据表明,食品行业行为体试图左右营养和身体活动方面的科学。但他们也参与影响科学诚信原则。我们的研究目的是研究这种参与的程度,以 ILSI 为例,研究其在该领域的关键作用。我们进行了定性文献分析,将现有范围界定审查、公开信息、行业内部文件和现有的信息自由请求的数据进行三角分析。
食品公司通过 ILSI 联手制定科学诚信原则。这些活动始于 2007 年,直接针对食品行业资助研究的日益增加的批评。ILSI 首先在个体和研究层面上构建了关于食品科学和营养中利益冲突的专门文献。由于该主题的文献稀缺,这些出版物在 ILSI 及其他组织关于利益冲突、科学诚信和 PPP 的进一步工作中被使用和引用,超出了营养和食品科学领域。在过去几年中,ILSI 开始制定科学诚信原则,并提议政府机构、专业协会、非营利组织和其他组织采用这些原则。在此过程中,ILSI 在科学诚信领域建立了声誉。ILSI 关于科学诚信的工作忽略了接受企业资金的风险,并且未能提供保护免受这些风险的指导方针。
ILSI 在科学诚信原则方面开展的活动是行业行为体影响公共卫生政策、研究和实践的更广泛政治实践的一部分。了解和抵制这些实践非常重要,因为它们有可能使科学标准符合行业利益,而不是公共卫生利益。