Santolini J, Meade A L, Stuehr D J
Department of Immunology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2001 Dec 28;276(52):48887-98. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108666200. Epub 2001 Oct 29.
We previously reported the existence of a special auto-regulation property of neuronal nitric-oxide synthase (NOS) based on NO near-geminate combination and partial trapping of neuronal NOS (nNOS) through a futile regenerating pathway. On this basis, we developed a kinetic simulation model that was proven to predict nNOS catalytic specificities and mutations effects (Santolini, J., Adak, S., Curran, C. M., and Stuehr, D. J. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1233-1243; Adak, S., Santolini, J., Tikunova, S., Wang, Q., Johnson, J. D., and Stuehr, D. J. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1244-1252). Here we show that the same model simulates and explains the distinct catalytic behaviors of inducible and endothelial NOS (iNOS and eNOS). Their marked differences were linked to variations in three basic parameters (rates of ferric heme reduction, ferric heme.NO dissociation, and ferrous heme.NO oxidation) that together control partitioning between futile and productive pathways and their relative rates. We also incorporated feedback inhibition into the kinetic model to account for potential rebinding of accumulated solution NO. The model accurately simulated the different relative impacts of both NOS.NO interactions (near-geminate combination of NO versus rebinding of solution NO) on catalytic behavior of each NOS isoform, including their speed and extent of heme.NO complex accumulation, K(m) for O(2), and propensity to transform NO into a higher oxide. Thus, individual catalytic behavior of any NOS can be understood through a single unified kinetic model. Because the model defines how different settings of individual kinetic parameters control regulation by two distinct NOS.NO interactions, it sheds light on mechanisms, structural features, and scope of NOS regulation and its physiologic impact.