Suppr超能文献

抗血小板药物与对照或抗凝治疗用于窦性心律心力衰竭的比较

Antiplatelet agents versus control or anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm.

作者信息

Lip G Y, Gibbs C R

机构信息

Haemostasis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham, UK, B18 7QH.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD003333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003333.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure is high, it predisposes to stroke and thromboembolism which in turn contribute to high mortality in heart failure.

OBJECTIVES

To determine effect of antiplatelet agents when compared to placebo or anticoagulant therapy on death and/or major thromboembolic events in adults with heart failure who are in sinus rhythm.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE). Abstracts from cardiology meetings and reference lists of relevant papers were searched. Authors of studies were contacted for further information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group placebo or controlled trials comparing antiplatelet therapy with control or anticoagulation in adults with chronic heart failure in sinus rhythm. Treatment for at least 1 month. To assess any adverse effects cohort study & non-randomised controlled studies were assessed. Orally administered antiplatelet agents e.g. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, TICLOPIDINE, CLOPIDOGREL, DIPYRIDAMOLE, ASPIRIN compared with anticoagulant agents e.g. COUMARINS, WARFARIN or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two reviewers independently. No meta-analyses were performed as no data were available from randomised comparisons. The data extracted included data relating to the complexities of the topic area, such as patient characteristics and concomitant treatments, as well as data relating to study eligibility, quality, and outcomes. Non-randomised studies were used to identify side-effects caused by anticoagulants.

MAIN RESULTS

One RCT of warfarin, aspirin versus no antithrombotic therapy was found but no definitive data have yet been published. Three retrospective, non-randomised cohort studies from the V-HeFT, SOLVD and SAVE trials examining the role of ACE inhibitors have examined the role of aspirin therapy +/- anticoagulant therapy in patients with heart failure and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The results from these trials were conflicting.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: At present there is no evidence from long term RCTs to recommend use of aspirin to prevent thromboembolism in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm. A possible interaction with ACE inhibitors may reduce the efficacy of aspirin, although this evidence is from retrospective analyses of trial cohorts. There is also no evidence to indicate superior effects from oral anticoagulation, when compared to aspirin, in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm.

摘要

背景

有症状的慢性心力衰竭患者的发病率和死亡率很高,易引发中风和血栓栓塞,进而导致心力衰竭患者的高死亡率。

目的

与安慰剂或抗凝治疗相比,确定抗血小板药物对窦性心律的成年心力衰竭患者死亡和/或主要血栓栓塞事件的影响。

检索策略

系统检索电子数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、DARE)。检索了心脏病学会议的摘要和相关论文的参考文献列表。联系了研究作者以获取更多信息。

入选标准

随机平行组安慰剂或对照试验,比较抗血小板治疗与窦性心律的慢性心力衰竭成年患者的对照或抗凝治疗。治疗至少1个月。为评估任何不良反应,对队列研究和非随机对照研究进行了评估。口服抗血小板药物,如非甾体抗炎药、噻氯匹定、氯吡格雷、双嘧达莫、阿司匹林,与抗凝药物,如香豆素、华法林或安慰剂进行比较。

数据收集与分析

数据由两名审阅者独立提取。由于随机对照比较没有可用数据,因此未进行荟萃分析。提取的数据包括与该主题领域复杂性相关的数据,如患者特征和伴随治疗,以及与研究资格、质量和结果相关的数据。非随机研究用于确定抗凝剂引起的副作用。

主要结果

发现一项华法林、阿司匹林与无抗血栓治疗的随机对照试验,但尚未发表确切数据。来自V-HeFT、SOLVD和SAVE试验的三项回顾性、非随机队列研究,研究了ACE抑制剂的作用,同时也研究了阿司匹林治疗+/-抗凝治疗在心力衰竭和/或左心室收缩功能障碍患者中的作用。这些试验的结果相互矛盾。

审阅者结论

目前,长期随机对照试验没有证据推荐使用阿司匹林预防窦性心律心力衰竭患者的血栓栓塞。与ACE抑制剂的可能相互作用可能会降低阿司匹林的疗效,尽管这一证据来自试验队列的回顾性分析。也没有证据表明,对于窦性心律的心力衰竭患者,口服抗凝治疗比阿司匹林有更好的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验