Suppr超能文献

抗血小板药物与对照或抗凝治疗用于窦性心律心力衰竭的疗效比较:一项Cochrane系统评价

Antiplatelet agents versus control or anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm: a Cochrane systematic review.

作者信息

Lip G Y H, Gibbs C R

机构信息

Haemostasis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

QJM. 2002 Jul;95(7):461-8. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.7.461.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure predisposes to stroke and thromboembolism, which in turn contribute to the high mortality and morbidity in heart failure.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of antiplatelet agents, compared to placebo or anticoagulant therapy, on death and/or major thromboembolic events in adults with heart failure who are in sinus rhythm.

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomized parallel group placebo or controlled trials comparing oral antiplatelet therapy with control or anticoagulation therapy in adults with chronic heart failure in sinus rhythm.

DATA SOURCES

Reference lists of papers resulting from this search, electronic database searching (MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE), and abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings were studied to identify unpublished studies. Relevant authors of these studies were contacted to obtain further data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

These included duration of treatment of at least 1 month, and adults with heart failure due to any underlying cause. To assess any adverse effects, cohort study and non-randomized controlled studies were assessed. Inclusion decisions were duplicated, disagreement resolved by discussion or a third party. No meta-analyses were performed, as no data were available from randomized comparisons.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial of warfarin vs. aspirin vs. no antithrombotic therapy was found, but no definitive data have yet been published. Three retrospective, non-randomized cohort studies from large trials examining the role of ACE inhibitors have examined the role of aspirin therapy with and without anticoagulant therapy in patients with heart failure and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction were identified, but the results from these trials were conflicting. A possible interaction with ACE inhibitors may reduce the efficacy of aspirin, although this evidence is from retrospective analyses of trial cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

At present there is no evidence from long term RCTs to recommend use of aspirin to prevent thromboembolism in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm. There is also no evidence to indicate superior effects from oral anticoagulation, when compared to aspirin, in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭易引发中风和血栓栓塞,而这反过来又导致心力衰竭患者的高死亡率和高发病率。

目的

确定与安慰剂或抗凝治疗相比,抗血小板药物对窦性心律的成年心力衰竭患者死亡和/或主要血栓栓塞事件的影响。

设计

对随机平行组安慰剂或对照试验进行系统评价,比较口服抗血小板治疗与对照或抗凝治疗对窦性心律的慢性心力衰竭成年患者的疗效。

数据来源

对本次检索所得论文的参考文献列表、电子数据库检索(MEDLINE、EMBASE、DARE)以及国家和国际心血管会议的摘要进行研究,以识别未发表的研究。与这些研究的相关作者联系以获取更多数据。

入选标准

这些标准包括至少1个月的治疗持续时间,以及因任何潜在病因导致心力衰竭的成年人。为评估任何不良反应,对队列研究和非随机对照研究进行了评估。纳入决策进行了重复,分歧通过讨论或第三方解决。由于没有随机对照比较的数据,因此未进行荟萃分析。

结果

发现一项华法林与阿司匹林及无抗血栓治疗对比的随机对照试验,但尚未发表确切数据。从大型试验中检索到三项回顾性、非随机队列研究,这些研究在研究血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂作用的同时,研究了阿司匹林治疗在有或无抗凝治疗情况下对心力衰竭和/或左心室收缩功能障碍患者的作用,但这些试验结果相互矛盾。与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂可能存在的相互作用可能会降低阿司匹林的疗效,尽管这一证据来自试验队列的回顾性分析。

结论

目前尚无长期随机对照试验的证据推荐使用阿司匹林预防窦性心律心力衰竭患者的血栓栓塞。也没有证据表明,对于窦性心律心力衰竭患者,口服抗凝治疗比阿司匹林有更好的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验