• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

III期临床试验中二元治疗反应的适应性设计:争议与进展

Adaptive designs for binary treatment responses in phase III clinical trials: controversies and progress.

作者信息

Biswas A

机构信息

Applied Statistics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B.T. Road, Kolkata 700 035, India.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2001 Oct;10(5):353-64. doi: 10.1177/096228020101000504.

DOI:10.1177/096228020101000504
PMID:11697227
Abstract

In phase III clinical trials the problem is to compare two treatments or therapies for their effects. The randomized 50:50 allocation to the two competing treatments is popular in most of the cases. In contrast there is a class of adaptive designs available in literature for this purpose. The object is to treat a larger number of patients by the eventual better treatment. A few such adaptive designs were conducted out in practical applications and consequently a lot of controversy arose. In spite of that there is steady theoretical progress in this area over the past three decades. The present paper reviews some of the real-life adaptive clinical trials and discusses some logistics of such trials.

摘要

在III期临床试验中,问题在于比较两种治疗方法或疗法的效果。在大多数情况下,将患者以50:50的比例随机分配到两种相互竞争的治疗方法中很常见。相比之下,文献中有一种适用于此目的的适应性设计。目的是通过最终更好的治疗方法治疗更多患者。一些这样的适应性设计在实际应用中进行了,结果引发了很多争议。尽管如此,在过去三十年里,这一领域仍取得了稳步的理论进展。本文回顾了一些实际的适应性临床试验,并讨论了此类试验的一些后勤问题。

相似文献

1
Adaptive designs for binary treatment responses in phase III clinical trials: controversies and progress.III期临床试验中二元治疗反应的适应性设计:争议与进展
Stat Methods Med Res. 2001 Oct;10(5):353-64. doi: 10.1177/096228020101000504.
2
An urn model for odds-ratio-based response-adaptive phase III clinical trials for two or more treatments.用于两种或更多种治疗的基于比值比的响应自适应III期临床试验的瓮模型。
J Biopharm Stat. 2009 Sep;19(5):838-56. doi: 10.1080/10543400903105331.
3
A class of Covariate-Adjusted Response-Adaptive Allocation Designs for Multitreatment Binary Response Trials.一类用于多治疗二元反应试验的协变量调整响应自适应分配设计。
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(5):809-823. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1485683. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
4
Confirmatory clinical trials with an adaptive design.采用适应性设计的验证性临床试验。
Biom J. 2006 Aug;48(4):574-85. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200510239.
5
Response-adaptive designs for continuous treatment responses in phase III clinical trials: A review.III期临床试验中连续治疗反应的适应性设计综述
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Feb;25(1):81-100. doi: 10.1177/0962280212441424. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
6
Response-Adaptive Allocation for Circular Data.
J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(4):830-42. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.920857.
7
How practical are adaptive designs likely to be for confirmatory trials?适应性设计对于确证性试验的实用性如何?
Biom J. 2006 Aug;48(4):644-9; discussion 660-2. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200610242.
8
Statistical inference for response adaptive randomization procedures with adjusted optimal allocation proportions.具有调整后最优分配比例的响应自适应随机化程序的统计推断。
J Biopharm Stat. 2017;27(5):732-740. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2016.1269780. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
9
An adaptive group sequential design for phase II/III clinical trials that select a single treatment from several.一种用于II/III期临床试验的适应性组序贯设计,该设计从几种治疗方法中选择单一治疗方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15(4):641-58. doi: 10.1081/BIP-200062857.
10
Optimal response-adaptive randomized designs for multi-armed survival trials.多臂生存试验的最优反应自适应随机设计。
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 30;30(24):2890-910. doi: 10.1002/sim.4331. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian adaptive randomization designs for targeted agent development.贝叶斯适应性随机分组设计在靶向药物研发中的应用
Clin Trials. 2010 Oct;7(5):584-96. doi: 10.1177/1740774510373120. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
2
Bayesian adaptive design for targeted therapy development in lung cancer--a step toward personalized medicine.用于肺癌靶向治疗开发的贝叶斯适应性设计——迈向个性化医疗的一步。
Clin Trials. 2008;5(3):181-93. doi: 10.1177/1740774508091815.