Wade J, Petheram B, Cain R
Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Disabil Rehabil. 2001 Sep 20;23(14):604-13. doi: 10.1080/09638280110044932.
This preliminary investigation of the use of voice recognition software by people with aphasia presents a new method of training the software, which allows the aphasic user to by-pass the linguistically demanding standard training. It examines how accurately voice recognition software performed with aphasic speech and language as compared to that of control subjects.
Five non-impaired controls and six participants with aphasia used a vocabulary of 50 words and 24 phrases to train the software over a maximum of five sessions. For the people with aphasia baseline assessments provided a profile of speech and language impairment. Measures of software accuracy were taken for all subjects at baseline and after four subsequent training sessions, for both single word and phrase level dictation.
Word level production resulted in similar accuracy levels for both groups. Phrase level production showed greater accuracy levels than single word level production for both aphasics and controls, but participants with greater speech difficulties had lower software accuracy scores.
Training the software on a specific vocabulary allows people to access it whose speech and language difficulties would otherwise have prevented them. Findings are discussed in relation to use of the software as a dictation tool and as an input device to therapy software.
这项对失语症患者使用语音识别软件的初步研究提出了一种训练该软件的新方法,该方法使失语症用户能够绕过对语言要求较高的标准训练。它研究了与对照组相比,语音识别软件对失语症患者的语音和语言识别的准确程度。
5名无语言障碍的对照组人员和6名失语症患者使用50个单词和24个短语的词汇表,最多进行5次训练来训练该软件。对于失语症患者,基线评估提供了语音和语言障碍的概况。在基线时以及随后的4次训练后,对所有受试者进行单词和短语听写的软件准确性测量。
两组在单词水平的输出准确率相似。对于失语症患者和对照组,短语水平的输出准确率均高于单词水平,但言语困难较大的参与者软件准确性得分较低。
在特定词汇表上训练该软件,使那些原本因言语和语言困难而无法使用的人也能够使用它。结合将该软件用作听写工具和治疗软件的输入设备对研究结果进行了讨论。