• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NUVA:一种用于失语症治疗的命名发声验证器。

NUVA: A Naming Utterance Verifier for Aphasia Treatment.

作者信息

Barbera David S, Huckvale Mark, Fleming Victoria, Upton Emily, Coley-Fisher Henry, Doogan Catherine, Shaw Ian, Latham William, Leff Alexander P, Crinion Jenny

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, U.K.

Speech, Hearing & Phonetic Sciences, University College London, U.K.

出版信息

Comput Speech Lang. 2021 Sep;69:None. doi: 10.1016/j.csl.2021.101221.

DOI:10.1016/j.csl.2021.101221
PMID:34483474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8117974/
Abstract

Anomia (word-finding difficulties) is the hallmark of aphasia, an acquired language disorder most commonly caused by stroke. Assessment of speech performance using picture naming tasks is a key method for both diagnosis and monitoring of responses to treatment interventions by people with aphasia (PWA). Currently, this assessment is conducted manually by speech and language therapists (SLT). Surprisingly, despite advancements in automatic speech recognition (ASR) and artificial intelligence with technologies like deep learning, research on developing automated systems for this task has been scarce. Here we present NUVA, an utterance verification system incorporating a deep learning element that classifies 'correct' versus' incorrect' naming attempts from aphasic stroke patients. When tested on eight native British-English speaking PWA the system's performance accuracy ranged between 83.6% to 93.6%, with a 10-fold cross-validation mean of 89.5%. This performance was not only significantly better than a baseline created for this study using one of the leading commercially available ASRs (Google speech-to-text service) but also comparable in some instances with two independent SLT ratings for the same dataset.

摘要

命名障碍(找词困难)是失语症的标志,失语症是一种后天性语言障碍,最常见的病因是中风。使用图片命名任务评估言语表现是诊断和监测失语症患者(PWA)对治疗干预反应的关键方法。目前,这项评估由言语和语言治疗师(SLT)手动进行。令人惊讶的是,尽管自动语音识别(ASR)和深度学习等人工智能技术取得了进展,但针对这项任务开发自动化系统的研究却很少。在此,我们展示了NUVA,这是一个话语验证系统,它包含一个深度学习元素,可对失语性中风患者的“正确”与“错误”命名尝试进行分类。在8名以英式英语为母语的PWA上进行测试时,该系统的性能准确率在83.6%至93.6%之间,10倍交叉验证均值为89.5%。这一性能不仅显著优于使用领先的商用ASR之一(谷歌语音转文本服务)为本研究创建的基线,而且在某些情况下与同一数据集的两个独立SLT评级相当。

相似文献

1
NUVA: A Naming Utterance Verifier for Aphasia Treatment.NUVA:一种用于失语症治疗的命名发声验证器。
Comput Speech Lang. 2021 Sep;69:None. doi: 10.1016/j.csl.2021.101221.
2
A Comparative Investigation of Automatic Speech Recognition Platforms for Aphasia Assessment Batteries.失语症评估工具的自动语音识别平台比较研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;23(2):857. doi: 10.3390/s23020857.
3
Improved vocabulary production after naming therapy in aphasia: can gains in picture naming generalize to connected speech?命名疗法对失语症患者词汇生成能力的改善:图片命名的改善能否推广到连续言语?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Nov-Dec;44(6):1036-62. doi: 10.1080/13682820802585975.
4
Efficacy of a gamified digital therapy for speech production in people with chronic aphasia (iTalkBetter): behavioural and imaging outcomes of a phase II item-randomised clinical trial.一种用于慢性失语症患者言语产生的游戏化数字疗法(iTalkBetter)的疗效:一项II期项目随机临床试验的行为和影像学结果
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 21;70:102483. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102483. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Automatic Assessment of Speech Impairment in Cantonese-speaking People with Aphasia.粤语失语症患者言语障碍的自动评估
IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process. 2020 Feb;14(2):331-345. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2019.2956371. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
6
Therapy for naming difficulties in bilingual aphasia: which language benefits?双语失语症命名困难的治疗:哪种语言受益?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):48-62. doi: 10.3109/13682822.2010.484845. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
7
Action-naming performance in four syndromes of aphasia.四种失语症综合征中的动作命名表现。
Brain Lang. 1987 Sep;32(1):124-36. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90120-9.
8
An analysis of aphasic naming errors as an indicator of improved linguistic processing following phonomotor treatment.分析失语症命名错误作为语音运动治疗后语言处理能力提高的指标。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 May;22(2):S240-9. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0078).
9
The relationship between novel word learning and anomia treatment success in adults with chronic aphasia.慢性失语症成人中新颖词汇学习与失语症治疗成功之间的关系。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 29;81:186-197. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.026. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
10
Effects of context and word class on lexical retrieval in Chinese speakers with anomic aphasia.语境和词类对命名性失语症汉语患者词汇检索的影响。
Aphasiology. 2015 Jan;29(1):81-100. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.951598.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-assisted assessment and treatment of aphasia: a review.人工智能辅助的失语症评估与治疗:综述
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;12:1401240. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401240. eCollection 2024.
2
Efficacy of a gamified digital therapy for speech production in people with chronic aphasia (iTalkBetter): behavioural and imaging outcomes of a phase II item-randomised clinical trial.一种用于慢性失语症患者言语产生的游戏化数字疗法(iTalkBetter)的疗效:一项II期项目随机临床试验的行为和影像学结果
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 21;70:102483. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102483. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Intelligent speech technologies for transcription, disease diagnosis, and medical equipment interactive control in smart hospitals: A review.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic Assessment of Speech Impairment in Cantonese-speaking People with Aphasia.粤语失语症患者言语障碍的自动评估
IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process. 2020 Feb;14(2):331-345. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2019.2956371. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
2
Feasibility of Automatic Speech Recognition for Providing Feedback During Tablet-Based Treatment for Apraxia of Speech Plus Aphasia.基于平板电脑的言语失用症加失语症治疗期间自动语音识别提供反馈的可行性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Jul 15;28(2S):818-834. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-MSC18-18-0109.
3
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.
智能医院中用于转录、疾病诊断和医疗设备交互控制的智能语音技术:综述。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Feb;153:106517. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106517. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
4
Deep learning.深度学习。
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
5
SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English.SUBTLEX-UK:一个全新且经过改进的英式英语词汇频率数据库。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1176-90. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
6
Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.四万常见英语单词词素的具体性等级评定。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5.
7
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
8
AphasiaBank: Methods for Studying Discourse.失语症语料库:话语研究方法
Aphasiology. 2011;25(11):1286-1307. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.589893. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
9
AphasiaBank: a resource for clinicians.失语症语料库:临床医生的资源。
Semin Speech Lang. 2012 Aug;33(3):217-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1320041. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
10
Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.30000 个英语单词的习得年龄评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4.