Nösslinger T, Reisner R, Koller E, Grüner H, Tüchler H, Nowotny H, Pittermann E, Pfeilstöcker M
Third Medical Department for Hematology and Oncology and the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Leukemia Research and Hematology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Blood. 2001 Nov 15;98(10):2935-41. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.10.2935.
In 1999 a working group of the World Health Organization (WHO) published a revised classification for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): RA, RARS, refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RC+Dys), RAEB I and II, del (5q) syndrome, and MDS unclassifiable. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and RAEB-t were excluded. Standard French-American-British (FAB) and new WHO classifications have been compared in a series of patients (n = 431) from a single center, analyzing morphologic, clinical, and cytogenetic data. According to the WHO findings, dysgranulocytopoiesis or dysmegakaryocytopoiesis only were found in 26% of patients with less than 5% medullary blasts. These patients are thus unclassified and should remain in the subgroups RA and RARS. Splitting of heterogeneous RAEB into 2 subgroups according to blast count was supported by a trend to a statistically significant difference in the single-center study population. Patients with CMML whose white blood cell counts are above 13 000/microL may be excluded from the MDS classification, as warranted by WHO, but a redistribution of patients with dysplastic CMML according to medullary blast count leads to more heterogeneity in other WHO subgroups. Although the natural courses of RAEB-T and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with dysplasia are different, comparable median survival durations after treatment in patients with RAEB-T and AML were in favor of the proposed 20% medullary blast threshold for AML. The homogeneity of subgroups was studied by evaluating prognostic scores. A significant shift into lower IPSS risk groups was evident in the new classification. These data cannot provide evidence for the new WHO proposal, which should not be adopted for routine clinical use at present. Some of its aspects can provide a starting point for further studies involving refined cytogenetics and clinical results.
1999年,世界卫生组织(WHO)的一个工作组发表了骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的修订分类:难治性贫血(RA)、难治性贫血伴环形铁粒幼细胞增多(RARS)、多系发育异常的难治性血细胞减少症(RC+Dys)、难治性贫血伴原始细胞增多I型和II型、5q缺失综合征以及无法分类的MDS。慢性粒单核细胞白血病(CMML)和转化型难治性贫血伴原始细胞增多(RAEB-t)被排除在外。在一个单一中心的一系列患者(n = 431)中,对标准的法美英(FAB)分类和新的WHO分类进行了比较,分析了形态学、临床和细胞遗传学数据。根据WHO的研究结果,在骨髓原始细胞低于5%的患者中,仅发现有粒系发育异常或巨核系发育异常的患者占26%。因此,这些患者无法分类,应仍归为RA和RARS亚组。在单中心研究人群中,根据原始细胞计数将异质性的RAEB分为2个亚组得到了统计学上显著差异趋势的支持。WHO认为,白细胞计数高于13000/μL的CMML患者可能被排除在MDS分类之外,但根据骨髓原始细胞计数对发育异常的CMML患者进行重新分类会导致WHO其他亚组的异质性增加。尽管RAEB-T和伴有发育异常的急性髓系白血病(AML)的自然病程不同,但RAEB-T患者和AML患者治疗后的中位生存时间相当,这支持了提议的AML的20%骨髓原始细胞阈值。通过评估预后评分研究了亚组的同质性。在新分类中,明显向较低的国际预后评分系统(IPSS)风险组转移。这些数据不能为WHO的新提议提供证据,目前该提议不应在临床常规中采用。其某些方面可为涉及精细细胞遗传学和临床结果的进一步研究提供一个起点。